Skip to content

Dynamically choose the appropriate library for experimental filesystem #146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2019

Conversation

emersonknapp
Copy link
Contributor

@emersonknapp emersonknapp commented Mar 6, 2019

Choose based on the compiler and standard library

Signed-off-by: Emerson Knapp eknapp@amazon.com

Related to ros2/ros2#664

…the compiler and standard library

Signed-off-by: Emerson Knapp <eknapp@amazon.com>
@nuclearsandwich

This comment has been minimized.

@emersonknapp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nuclearsandwich can we run this one solo? it should be independently correct of the other related PRs

@nuclearsandwich

This comment has been minimized.

@emersonknapp
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am not able to reproduce these errors, tried on linux and osx with the repos gist from the CI run - and I don't have access to the buildfarm to explore further - any ideas?

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member

The previous CI issue was likely related to misusing colcon package selection for the test phase. Instead of trying to get fancy, I just enumerated packages downstream of pluginlib locally and targetd those:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member

I'd like to wait to merge this until we can test that it works with other libcxx changes.

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member

Tested in ros2/poco_vendor#24 (comment). The tests are failing due to undiagnosed issues in class_loader which will be addressed in followup.

@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich merged commit 3bbc242 into ros:ros2 Mar 21, 2019
@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich removed their request for review March 21, 2019 18:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants