Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interface packages should fully <depend> on the interface packages that they depend on #173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2022

Conversation

mxgrey
Copy link
Contributor

@mxgrey mxgrey commented Feb 3, 2022

It seems that the interface packages are missing a <build_export_depend> tag for the interface packages that they depend on. The build export dependency is important because downstream packages need to know about the upstream interface dependencies at build time, e.g. to have access to the headers of the upstream interface packages. The lack of this tag made it impossible for rosidl_generator_rs to correctly identify the build dependency tree for the message packages.

But also, adding <build_export_depend> onto the already existing <build_depend> and <exec_depend> tags is the same as just specifying the <depend> tag, so this PR simplifies all the depend tags to just <depend>.

…at they depend on

Signed-off-by: Michael X. Grey <grey@openrobotics.org>
@gbiggs
Copy link
Member

gbiggs commented Feb 14, 2022

CI:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@gbiggs
Copy link
Member

gbiggs commented Feb 21, 2022

New CI with the build farm not ignoring packages involved in this PR:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@gbiggs
Copy link
Member

gbiggs commented Feb 21, 2022

The GitHub-run PR check failure is an exception in flake8 itself. Since the manual CI passes, I'm going to merge this.

@gbiggs gbiggs merged commit ea761cc into ros2:master Feb 21, 2022
@mxgrey mxgrey deleted the fix_depend branch March 13, 2022 11:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants