Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure load_composable_nodes respects condition #339

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2022

Conversation

methylDragon
Copy link
Contributor

This addresses #335 and #328

Description

It turns out that the LoadComposableNodes action ignores conditions. This is because it was meant to interact with composable node containers via the composition_interfaces/srv/LoadNode service, which has no concept of conditions.

This means that the condition check has to happen prior to the population of service calls to make, which this PR adds.

I also added new tests to support the new behavior.

@methylDragon
Copy link
Contributor Author

methylDragon commented Dec 8, 2022

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status Rerun (a prior package failed): Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

Signed-off-by: methylDragon <methylDragon@gmail.com>
@methylDragon methylDragon force-pushed the ch3/bugfix-load-composable-nodes branch from 2abf5cc to c36c455 Compare December 8, 2022 01:23
@methylDragon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please!

Copy link
Contributor

@adityapande-1995 adityapande-1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the bugfix ! Looks good with green CI !

@methylDragon methylDragon merged commit e2c2025 into rolling Dec 8, 2022
@methylDragon methylDragon deleted the ch3/bugfix-load-composable-nodes branch December 8, 2022 05:33
@RBT22
Copy link

RBT22 commented Nov 14, 2024

Can we backport this fix to humble?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants