Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a generic node container #115

Closed
wjwwood opened this issue Sep 16, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Create a generic node container #115

wjwwood opened this issue Sep 16, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member

wjwwood commented Sep 16, 2015

This is a spin-off from: ros2/ros2#55

We need a generic program which can be run and then remotely instructed to load and execute a node.

This program should probably:

  • Allow configuration of the internal executor.
  • Provide ROS Services for loading and running a node.

This is not really useful until we have the ability to make, find, and dynamically load nodes, see:

This is also blocked by decisions that need to be made in: #48

@Karsten1987
Copy link
Contributor

@wjwwood Can this be closed given that we have the composition demos?

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member Author

wjwwood commented Feb 26, 2018

No, the demo just demonstrates the technology, it doesn’t provide a general purpose executable that people can rely on going forward. It wouldn’t be a good idea for people to build robot launch files that launch critical executables from a demo package.

@rotu
Copy link
Contributor

rotu commented Jul 2, 2019

@wjwwood How about now that rclcpp_components component_container exists?

nnmm pushed a commit to ApexAI/rclcpp that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2022
Control shared/static linking via BUILD_SHARED_LIBS and ament_cmake_ros
DensoADAS pushed a commit to DensoADAS/rclcpp that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2022
Signed-off-by: William Woodall <william@osrfoundation.org>
mauropasse pushed a commit to mauropasse/rclcpp that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2023
@ZhenshengLee
Copy link

Canbe closed? @wjwwood

@mjcarroll
Copy link
Member

Yes, I think we are good here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants