Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2019. It is now read-only.

set urdf content as parameter #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 28, 2019
Merged

Conversation

Karsten1987
Copy link

@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 commented Oct 15, 2018

This PR sets the loaded URDF as a parameter for the robot state publisher.

@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 added the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Oct 15, 2018
@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 added question Further information is requested more-information-needed Further information is required and removed in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) labels Feb 14, 2019
@Karsten1987
Copy link
Author

This issue and the related PR for Rviz needs more information. The question to clarify here is whether the robot description should be a parameter in the first place or rather being published via topic.
If believe having shortly talked about this with @wjwwood but I am uncertain if we settled on anything.

@Karsten1987
Copy link
Author

So the consensus was that it most likely makes sense to provide both, the topic and the parameter for the robot description and thus this PR can be set back to in review.

@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 added in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) and removed more-information-needed Further information is required question Further information is requested labels Feb 20, 2019
@clalancette
Copy link

So the consensus was that it most likely makes sense to provide both, the topic and the parameter for the robot description and thus this PR can be set back to in review.

Works for me.

@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 merged commit 9698b2b into ros2 Mar 28, 2019
@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 deleted the load_robot_model_from_parameter branch March 28, 2019 23:52
@Karsten1987 Karsten1987 removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Mar 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants