Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix list_priorities.py for configs which use !include tags. #135

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member

This file, introduced in #120, causes the script to fail since it
contains a YAML string scalar rather than dict.

Even after this commit the script fails due to the include block in
rolling/ci-benchmark.yaml so that needs to be dealt with for this PR to
move forward. The easiest way would be to find a way to ignore the include since currently the priority field is not behind an include.

A cherry on top of this PR would be adding a GitHub Action which runs priority list on PRs which would also keep the script working.

FYI @cottsay

@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich self-assigned this Oct 22, 2020
nuclearsandwich pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2020
* Update the buildfarm config with the new gpg keys.
This file, introduced in #120, causes the script to fail since it
contains a YAML string scalar rather than dict.

Even after this commit the script fails due to the include block in
rolling/ci-benchmark.yaml so that needs to be dealt with for this PR to
move forward.

Signed-off-by: Steven! Ragnarök <steven@nuclearsandwich.com>
@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich changed the title Ignore "common" directory in priorities check. Fix list_priorities.py for configs which use !include tags. Apr 18, 2022
@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich marked this pull request as ready for review April 18, 2022 22:00
@clalancette
Copy link

This PR is really old, and list_priorities.py supports includes since #232. So I'm going to close this out; feel free to reopen if you think we still need this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants