-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adapters problem #64
Comments
Hi Emma, I am trying to figure out the adaptor trimming for my minion data as well. My main question is why would we not include the entire adaptor sequence for the Y adaptors and the 1D^2 adaptors in adapters.py? Laura |
Just to clarify, the SQK-LSK108 adapter is identical to SQK-NSK007 already in adapters.py. Not sure why it only includes the 2nd half, but I can confirm that it does properly remove the adapters from the SQK-LSK108 sequencing data I have. |
Hi Katie!
Thanks so much for your response
Can you tell me how you confirmed that porechop removed the entire adaptor?
I am still new to bioinformatics work and am trying to get oriented with
understanding sequencing data,
Thanks
Laura
…On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Katie Doroschak ***@***.***> wrote:
Just to clarify, the SQK-LSK108 adapter is identical to SQK-NSK007 already
in adapters.py.
Not sure why it only includes the 2nd half, but I can confirm that it does
properly remove the adapters from the SQK-LSK108 sequencing data I have.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#64 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AlF6tieMPY2lYONMdC9k40tmOw8lVlmhks5t6HFfgaJpZM4UWOS1>
.
|
I have the same question, why is only the second half of adapter included? Is this preferred over creating additional adapters with the entire sequence? Any insight would be appreciated! |
One reason could be that basecallers (we use albacore) ...I think will chop off parts of the adapters when they convert fast5 reads into fastq files |
Hi, Make sure you are editing the correct adapters.py. Depending on your installation Porechop might have installed in and use the one present in the python-dist directory. "/usr/local/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/porechop/adapters.py" I see that this is a quite old thread but I had the same problem and maybe this info can be helpful to someone else. Cheers |
I also have this problem. I cannot get the right adapter.py to change. Where can I find it? |
To get the path of an installed package you can run: python -c "import porechop as pore; print(pore.path)" Depending on your system you might need to check which python was used for the installation and is called by the porechop executable, or else you might get a DistributionNotFound error. I.e:
|
Hi, Im using SQK LSK109. Im unable to find the adapter sequences anywhere online. Could you let me know where you found the adapter sequences for 108? Maybe I can do the same for 109. |
Hello! Any luck with this yet? I just came access the issue and using SQK-LSK109 kit as well. I will try to dig into it as well. @ugh-astya - Thank you! |
Hello,
I’m working with the SQL-LSK 108 Kit and I have tried to add the adapter of this kit. However after including the new adapter in the adapter.py and start an analyze nothing happened, the new adapter wasn’t in the dialog box. I also try to modify the name of one adapter already in porechop and I have the same problem : the name hasn’t change.
I didn’t saw any other files to modify and I’m in the /Porechop/porechop/adapters.py.
Would you any idea how to solve my problem ? Alternatively, could you add the adapters if I provide you the sequences ?
Best regards,
Emma Corre
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: