New should_receive syntax

[laserlemon]

Now that the preferred RSpec syntax is:

expect(2 + 2).to eql(4)

rather than:

(2 + 2).should eq(4)

, should this also change:

user.should_receive(:update_attributes).with(name: "Steve")

to:

expect(user).to receive(:update_attributes).with(name: "Steve")

?

I like the new expect syntax but feel funny every time I use should_receive because it doesn't feel consistent. I just wanted to open up the conversation. Thank you!

[myronmarston]

There's an ongoing discussion about this in rspec/rspec-mocks#153. The short answer is that we're already planning on doing this but haven't gotten around to it yet.