Turn off ri and rdoc generation by default #42
Conversation
|
+1 |
5 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 please dear world please |
|
+1 |
3 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 definitely. |
|
+1 |
|
+1 ri and rdoc are available online usually so it's only useful for offline coding (in which case you could generate your own documentation very easily). |
|
+1 |
|
+ten hundred million thousand... I win |
|
+1 |
6 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
Holy crap @ response. +1 |
|
P.S. / FYI: my mother doesn't have this option turned on |
|
+1 |
3 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
wait +1 |
|
+1 |
|
Hey folks. I made this compromise patch which educates users how to use rdoc and ri, and how to not install them in the future. check it out! #44 |
|
+1 |
|
Good news, you can now unsubscribe to notifications from just this pull request. https://github.com/blog/821-mention-somebody-they-re-notified |
|
This is pull number 42. |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
You'll have my vote as well. +1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1, now more than ever. |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
pull request closed ? but ... +1 ! |
|
Why is it closed? Maybe GitHub bug or something |
|
-1, actually |
|
very much +1 |
|
+1 |
Hi guys,
It seems like everyone and their mother has --no-ri and --no-rdoc in their .gemrc file. Any objections to pulling that convention upstream?