Skip to content

Add detailed documentation for Transfers Poller/Receiver daemons #552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 8, 2025
Merged

Add detailed documentation for Transfers Poller/Receiver daemons #552

merged 4 commits into from
May 8, 2025

Conversation

panta-123
Copy link
Contributor

Closes: #397

transfer poller/reciever info

@panta-123 panta-123 requested a review from voetberg May 5, 2025 18:20
@panta-123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also CERN FTS uses activemq-classic . And not tested for activemq-artemis .
@voetberg , should we also mention that in conveyor-reciever part ?

voetberg
voetberg reviewed May 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
voetberg
voetberg previously approved these changes May 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@voetberg voetberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@voetberg
Copy link
Contributor

voetberg commented May 5, 2025

Also CERN FTS uses activemq-classic . And not tested for activemq-artemis . @voetberg , should we also mention that in conveyor-reciever part ?

I'm not sure honestly, how community specific is that? I don't do operations, so if you think this is information an operator setting up a new instance should know, you can add it as a note.

@panta-123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also CERN FTS uses activemq-classic . And not tested for activemq-artemis . @voetberg , should we also mention that in conveyor-reciever part ?

I'm not sure honestly, how community specific is that? I don't do operations, so if you think this is information an operator setting up a new instance should know, you can add it as a note.

Added to note.

@voetberg voetberg merged commit 6d69408 into rucio:main May 8, 2025
6 checks passed
@panta-123 panta-123 deleted the conveyor-recevier-#397 branch May 8, 2025 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@voetberg voetberg voetberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Workflow: How to set up conveyor reciever daemon with different transfer tools
2 participants
@panta-123 @voetberg