-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix panic while decoding large Miniscripts from Script #712
Fix panic while decoding large Miniscripts from Script #712
Conversation
The new lockfiles don't work with MSRV. |
ACK 54c7c2b other than the lockfile commit. |
32bd66c Release 10.2 (Sanket Kanjalkar) 708b89c Fix panic while decoding large Miniscripts from Script (Sanket Kanjalkar) Pull request description: ACKs for top commit: apoelstra: ACK 32bd66c Tree-SHA512: 946ea92a680cec1a7ccfc78138a4dbefed7421aac013f68bee3730882741eb1319a8ea3d351fe663d8881e84f0108460a65476e4371d65359e8a968ffe3b806b
fb6e8e9 Release 9.2 (Sanket Kanjalkar) a290a61 Fix panic while decoding large Miniscripts from Script (Sanket Kanjalkar) Pull request description: ACKs for top commit: apoelstra: utACK fb6e8e9; did test basic compilation on 1.41.1 Tree-SHA512: f384cefe15a2bca9de79447d038dba1f178e2e680931abe195f672160c3233088277fda287ce509181b47b0633daddb320e784e4d774309f1332e8cf434a343b
45bcd1a
to
74e81ef
Compare
@apoelstra this is ready for review. |
The new lockfile updates Ok if I force-push to this PR to try to fix the lockfiles? |
@apoelstra, please do. I was assuming that CI is happy means we are good |
@apoelstra I just tested it again with 1.56.1 and it works. |
Re "CI happy means we're good", see #719 -- we are actually testing only with Cargo-minimal.lock, not Cargo-recent.lock (which is broken). Furthermore, this lockfile commit makes several unnecessary changes and because it's in a separate commit from the one that changes Cargo.toml, also means that I cannot locally test every commit of this PR. |
74e81ef
to
192c499
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Successfully ran local tests on 192c499.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 192c499 successfully ran local tests
Tagged and published. |
c95b411 CI: Run MSRV job with both lock files (Tobin C. Harding) d8bfe10 Bump MSRV to Rust 1.63.0 (Tobin C. Harding) f62bdf3 fuzz: Upgrade hongfuzz patch version (Tobin C. Harding) Pull request description: As we have done in `rust-bitcoin` bump the MSVR to Rust 1.63.0 Also, run the MSRV CI job with both lockfiles (which are currently different). ACKs for top commit: apoelstra: ACK c95b411 successfully ran local tests; glad I got #712 in first so I could do the release! Tree-SHA512: b3ae9583f10ac2d01353736fe68a37bc0fff6774e4ea935b4fbf16bdb3cb033b4c281b8cb45d9e6ead343d2b7033d042190369cbe21b953ac392d19ff564cf1a
Use private module to guard all constructors.