Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add #[rustc_deprecated_safe] attribute to allow a function be be marked unsafe in a backwards compatible fashion #497

Closed
ghost opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 8, 2022

(incorrectly filed, please ignore)

@ghost ghost added major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team labels Mar 8, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 8, 2022

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

cc @rust-lang/compiler @rust-lang/compiler-contributors

@rustbot rustbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Mar 8, 2022
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 10, 2022

Closing this in favor of rust-lang/lang-team#147, this was filed on the wrong repo.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Mar 10, 2022
@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot label -to-announce

@rustbot rustbot removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Mar 15, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants