Skip to content

codegen: generate stable names for tests functions. #325

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2016

Conversation

emilio
Copy link
Contributor

@emilio emilio commented Dec 8, 2016

r? @heycam

@heycam
Copy link
Contributor

heycam commented Dec 8, 2016

Thanks! This is an improvement on the current situation, but I think the numbers will still often change depending on what types we (Gecko) happen to use in templates across the codebase. It would be nice if we could generate names based on the class name and its template arguments, though that might be a bit tricky. r=me on this, though.

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Dec 8, 2016

Yeah, that has its own sets of dangers/trickiness, in the sense that it's pretty hard to avoid conflicts (plus it's more inefficient). I see what you mean though. This is an improvement over the current situation I think.

@bors-servo r=heycam

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit dd80c27 has been approved by heycam

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit dd80c27 with merge 9b78e09...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
codegen: generate stable names for tests functions.

r? @heycam
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit dd80c27 into rust-lang:master Dec 8, 2016
@emilio emilio deleted the stable-template-test branch December 8, 2016 08:57
emilio added a commit to emilio/servo that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
heycam pushed a commit to heycam/servo that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants