Skip to content

Conversation

ada4a
Copy link
Contributor

@ada4a ada4a commented Sep 7, 2025

For #6680

I wanted to move the lint into functions because it has a check_fn part, but it also has a check_stmt, which I wouldn't know what to do with.

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 7, 2025

r? @llogiq

rustbot has assigned @llogiq.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Sep 7, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2025

No changes for 2c27b58

@rustbot rustbot added S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work A-lint Area: New lints and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Sep 7, 2025
@ada4a
Copy link
Contributor Author

ada4a commented Sep 7, 2025

Nope, just moving a lint.

@rustbot label -A-lint -S-blocked S-waiting-on-review
@rustbot note remove Feature-freeze

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties and removed A-lint Area: New lints S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work labels Sep 7, 2025
@ada4a ada4a force-pushed the toplevel_ref_args branch from 2dcebda to 2c27b58 Compare September 7, 2025 13:41
@samueltardieu samueltardieu added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 368b235 Sep 8, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Sep 8, 2025
@ada4a ada4a deleted the toplevel_ref_args branch September 8, 2025 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants