Rollup of 6 pull requests #117714
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #117714
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Done by removing all uses of `#![no_core]`, and the reverting the ones that failed. More involved ones are in a later commit.
These were'nt done with regex, but don't require changes to assertions.
Assigned new feature name `core_io_borrowed_buf` to distinguish from the `Read::read_buf` functionality in `std::io`.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
When we switch back and forth between the old and recent branches, if there was a breaking change in the bootstrap configuration in between, we have to update the change-id in the build configuration with each checkout, which can be exhausting. This change fixes that. Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
handle the case when the change-id isn't found When we switch back and forth between the old and recent branches, if there was a breaking change in the bootstrap configuration in between, we have to update the change-id in the build configuration with each checkout, which can be exhausting. This change fixes that. r? saethlin
…eader, r=TaKO8Ki Recover from incorrectly ordered/duplicated function keywords Fixes rust-lang#115714
…eGomez tests/rustdoc-json: Avoid needless use of `no_core` and `lang_items` See rust-lang#117487 for motivation. I've split it into three commits, depending on how much work it was to remove `#![no_core]`. The first is entirely mechanical, the second makes no logical changes but couldn't be done with find+replace, and the third required rewriting assertions no not depend on having `#![no_core]`. All of the interesting changes for review are in the third commit, so I recommend reviewing commit-by-commit. After this, 3 tests still use `#![no_core]`: - `./tests/rustdoc-json/primitives/primitive_impls.rs`. Uses impls on primitives, so needs to simulate core - `./tests/rustdoc-json/primitives/local_primitive.rs`: Uses `rustc_doc_primitive`, so needs to simulate core - `./tests/rustdoc-json/impls/auto.rs`: Uses auto traits, so needs to simulate core But after this change, we only rely on the core-rustc boundary in tests that deliberately test those interactions. r? `@GuillaumeGomez` Fixes rust-lang#117487
…m-ou-se Move `BorrowedBuf` and `BorrowedCursor` from `std:io` to `core::io` Tracking issue: rust-lang#117693 ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#290
…=petrochenkov target: move base and target specifications Follow-up to rust-lang#116004. In anticipation of later PRs where we'll want to add tidy checks to ensure that, for each target, we have a test or a platform support document or something like that, this PR moves target specifications into a directory on their own so that we can just list the files in this directory to get a list of all targets. - Base specifications are moved to `rustc_target::spec::base`. - Target specifications are moved to `rustc_target::spec::targets`. - All the other source files containing types used in the target specs remain in `rustc_target::spec`. - `rustc_target/src/spec/abi.rs` is moved to `rustc_target/src/spec/abi/mod.rs` (where there was already a `tests.rs`) for uniformity. r? `@petrochenkov`
…n, r=notriddle Add test for reexported hidden item with `--document-hidden-items` Coming from [this discussion on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/Using.20cargo-semver-checks.20in.20rustdoc.20JSON.20tests.3A.20revisited). cc `@aDotInTheVoid` r? `@notriddle`
rustbot
added
A-rustdoc-json
|
@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@bors r- |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #115460) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
no_coreandlang_items#117679 (tests/rustdoc-json: Avoid needless use ofno_coreandlang_items)BorrowedBufandBorrowedCursorfromstd:iotocore::io#117694 (MoveBorrowedBufandBorrowedCursorfromstd:iotocore::io)--document-hidden-items#117713 (Add test for reexported hidden item with--document-hidden-items)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup