Rollup of 11 pull requests #61737
Closed
Rollup of 11 pull requests #61737
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There's no need to have it given it merely forwarded to RustbookSrc.
Removing the tool argument in the previous commit means it's no longer restricted to just bootstrap tools despite being written as such. Inlining it prevents accidental use.
There's no reason for it to be std-based
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
This commit fixes an ICE that occured when a const generic was used in a repeat expression. This was due to the code expecting the length of the repeat expression to be const evaluatable to a constant, but a const generic parameter is not (however, it can be made into a constant).
This is duplicated in a few locations throughout the sysroot to work around issues with not exporting a macro in libstd but still wanting it available to sysroot crates to define blocks. Nowadays though we can simply depend on the `cfg-if` crate on crates.io, allowing us to use it from there!
It's a less powerful duplicate of `SyntaxExtension::NormalTT`
We already use this for `unzip`, but `partition` is not much different.
move some tests into subfolders This reduces the size of the test folders without making the moved tests harder to find. Is this kind of change desired/worth the effort?
Windows 10 SDK is also required now.
Remove some legacy proc macro flavors
Namely
- `IdentTT` (`foo! ident { ... }`). Can be replaced with `foo! { ident ... }` or something similar.
- `MultiDecorator`. Can be replaced by `MultiModifier` (aka `LegacyAttr` after renaming).
- `DeclMacro`. It was a less powerful duplicate of `NormalTT` (aka `LegacyBang` after renaming) and can be replaced by it.
Stuff like this slows down any attempts to refactor the expansion infra, so it's desirable to retire it already.
I'm not sure whether a lang team decision is necessary, but would be nice to land this sooner because I have some further work in this area scheduled.
The documentation commit (rust-lang@a9397fd) describes how the remaining variants are different from each other and shows that there's actually some system behind them.
The last commit renames variants of `SyntaxExtension` in more systematic way.
- `ProcMacro` -> `Bang`
- `NormalTT` -> `LegacyBang`
- `AttrProcMacro` -> `Attr`
- `MultiModifier` -> `LegacyAttr`
- `ProcMacroDerive` -> `Derive`
- `BuiltinDerive` -> `LegacyDerive`
All the `Legacy*` variants are AST-based, as opposed to "modern" token-based variants.
…r=alexcrichton Bootstrap cleanup Each commit is (mostly) standalone and probably best reviewed as such. Nothing too major just some drive-by nits as I was looking through the code. r? @alexcrichton
…ebank librustc_errors: Add some more documentation r? @estebank
… r=varkor typeck: Fix const generic in repeat param ICE. Fixes rust-lang#61336. Turns out this wasn't related to rust-lang#49147 after all. r? @varkor
…chton Azure: retry failed awscli installs Fixes rust-lang#61604 r? @pietroalbini
…rkor make sure make_ascii_lowercase actually leaves upper-case non-ASCII characters alone Cc rust-lang#61677 @napen123
…fackler std: Remove internal definitions of `cfg_if!` macro This is duplicated in a few locations throughout the sysroot to work around issues with not exporting a macro in libstd but still wanting it available to sysroot crates to define blocks. Nowadays though we can simply depend on the `cfg-if` crate on crates.io, allowing us to use it from there!
core: use memcmp optimization for 128 bit integer slices All other sized integer slices do this. From rust-lang#61665.
Use `for_each` in `Iterator::partition` We already use this for `unzip`, but `partition` is not much different.
|
@bors r+ p=11 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 5837b9f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 5837b9f with merge e3975fde7df7e2387ed441df8ee001d44562e2a6... |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
cfg_if!macro #61720 (std: Remove internal definitions ofcfg_if!macro)for_eachinIterator::partition#61726 (Usefor_eachinIterator::partition)Failed merges:
r? @ghost