Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move rustdoc UI tests into a subdirectory #82800

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2021

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Mar 5, 2021

Helps with #73494.

@jyn514 jyn514 added the A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc label Mar 5, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 5, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the group-rustdoc-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 5ea970f to a0e98a4 Compare March 5, 2021 15:56
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Mar 5, 2021

@JohnTitor not sure if you have r+ permissions in rust-lang/rust or not, but just in case:

@bors delegate=JohnTitor

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2021

✌️ @JohnTitor can now approve this pull request

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

I have but it's for making rollup and I'm not part of any teams that r+ PRs here (though this LGTM). So I'd wait for Mark (or someone else) to review it, sorry.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Seems to be an accidental submodule update, r=me with that removed.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 7, 2021
This also adds a little leeway to the test limit.
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Mar 8, 2021

Seems to be an accidental submodule update, r=me with that removed.

Thanks, fixed.

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2021

📌 Commit bc1fbf5 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 8, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#82711 (Add documentation for string->Cow conversions)
 - rust-lang#82767 (Update minifier dependency version)
 - rust-lang#82800 (Move rustdoc UI tests into a subdirectory)
 - rust-lang#82810 (Typo fix in Unstable book: `cargo cov` -> `cargo profdata`)
 - rust-lang#82829 (Handle negative literals in cast overflow warning)
 - rust-lang#82854 (Account for `if (let pat = expr) {}`)
 - rust-lang#82870 (Add note about the `#[doc(no-inline)]` usage)
 - rust-lang#82874 (Add codegen tests for some issues closed by LLVM 12)
 - rust-lang#82881 (diagnostics: Be clear about "crate root" and `::foo` paths in resolve diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#82888 (Grammar Fixes)
 - rust-lang#82897 ([.mailmap] Add entry for Ramkumar Ramachandra)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5ff52cb into rust-lang:master Mar 9, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Mar 9, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the group-rustdoc-tests branch March 9, 2021 04:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants