Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #91365

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

estebank and others added 11 commits November 25, 2021 18:40
The tests checks some pretty-printer output, but pretty-printers are not embedded on windows-gnu
When recovering from a `:` in a pattern, use adequate AST pattern

If the suggestion to use `::` instead of `:` in the pattern isn't correct, a second resolution error will be emitted.
Don't treat unnormalized function arguments as well-formed

Partial revert of rust-lang#88312

r? `@pnkfelix`
cc `@nikomatsakis`
…crum

tests: Ignore `test/debuginfo/rc_arc.rs` on windows-gnu

The tests checks some pretty-printer output, but pretty-printers are not embedded on windows-gnu.

Regressed in rust-lang#85448.
CTFE: support assert_zero_valid and assert_uninit_valid

This ensures the implementation of all three type-based assert_ intrinsics remains consistent in Miri.

`assert_inhabited` recently got stabilized in rust-lang#90896 (meaning stable `const fn` can call it), so do the same with these other intrinsics.

Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
…=lnicola

⬆️ rust-analyzer

r? `@ghost`
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Nov 29, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2021

📌 Commit c34fe56 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 29, 2021
@jackh726
Copy link
Member

This will fail because test in #91243 needed an NLL bless

@jackh726 jackh726 closed this Nov 29, 2021
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-aq611ld branch December 12, 2021 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants