Repository navigation
Refactored the codebase to use Function instead of RValue where possible. - #720
Merged
Merged
Conversation
FractalFir
force-pushed
the
func_refactor
branch
from
June 25, 2025 11:19
2353d26 to
b03f7f8
Compare
antoyo
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2025
antoyo
left a comment
antoyo
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good job!
That's a nice improvement!
Contributor
|
Thanks for your contribution! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to the discussions about the
cg_ssaAPI over on zulip.#gsoc > Project: Bootstrap of rustc with rustc_codegen_gcc @ 💬
This PR adjusts
cg_gccto make use of some of the recent refactors(introudction ofBackendTypes::Function).