Attempted to tackle #1622

[Warfields]

Trying to fix #1622

[alexcrichton]

Looks great, thanks! Can you be sure to add a smoke test or two as well?

I also think for now we'll probably want to leave bind0 as bind to avoid a breaking change, but we can file an issue about changing it on the next major breaking version?

[Warfields]

Looks great, thanks! Can you be sure to add a smoke test or two as well?

I also think for now we'll probably want to leave bind0 as bind to avoid a breaking change, but we can file an issue about changing it on the next major breaking version?

Sounds good

[Warfields]

@alexcrichton The tests have been written, I've added declarations for both bind() and bind0()

[alexcrichton]

Thanks!