We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sage: solve([x**2-1>0,x>0],x,solution_dict=True) [{1: x}]
Probably the correct result from Maxima is mistranslated. Of course inequalities expressing interval results should not be converted to dict.
Component: symbolics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24102
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Another mistranslation, found when fooling around #21789 :
sage: SG=desolve(eq, y(x)) ; SG (_K2*log(x) + _K1)*x sage: # Boundary conditions sage: solve([SG(x=1)==e, SG(x=e)==2*e],[_K1,_K2]) [[e == _K1, _K2 == -e + 2]] sage: solve([SG(x=1)==e, SG(x=e)==2*e],[_K1,_K2], solution_dict=True) [{e: _K1, _K2: -e + 2}]
Such "solutions" inverting (part of) variable-value couples, can't be used for further substitution. This may be a cause of #21789...
Note that :
sage: var("a, b") (a, b) sage: solve([SG(x=1)==a, SG(x=e)==b],[_K1,_K2], solution_dict=True) [{_K1: a, _K2: -(a*e - b)*e^(-1)}] sage: SG.subs(solve([SG(x=1)==a, SG(x=e)==b],[_K1,_K2], solution_dict=True))(x=1) ....: a sage: SG.subs(solve([SG(x=1)==a, SG(x=e)==b],[_K1,_K2], solution_dict=True))(x=e) ....: .expand() b
This hints at a mishandling of "variable-lookalike" constants. Deep in the Maxima interface...
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Probably the correct result from Maxima is mistranslated. Of course inequalities expressing interval results should not be converted to dict.
Component: symbolics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24102
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: