-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a more efficient implementation of index for Gamma(N). #6606
Comments
Attachment: gamma.patch.gz |
comment:1
The code loooked (though I would have written p**(3e-2)(p*p-1) ) but after applying to 4.1:
Looks like someone forgot to run sage -t before submitting the patch... |
Reviewer: John Cremona |
comment:2
Attachment: gamma.2.patch.gz |
comment:3
I ran sage -t after applying the patch, and all tests pass. Looks good to me. |
comment:4
That's better! |
comment:5
Simon: The patch |
Changed reviewer from John Cremona to John Cremona, David Roed |
Changed author from simon to Simon Morris |
Merged: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 |
Gamma(N).index used the default implementation which was slow. Attached is a new implementation which works for the specific subgroup.
CC: @roed314
Component: modular forms
Author: Simon Morris
Reviewer: John Cremona, David Roed
Merged: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6606
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: