Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADD flat_threshold argument in find_bad_by_nan_flat method from NoisyChannels #144

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

nabilalibou
Copy link
Contributor

@nabilalibou nabilalibou commented Feb 8, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9999839) 98.89% compared to head (ff7f077) 98.89%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #144      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.89%   98.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         726      725       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          718      717       -1     
  Misses          8        8              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Owner

@sappelhoff sappelhoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a really good start!

Could you please:

@nabilalibou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Owner

wonderful, thanks a lot for your first contribution @nabilalibou!

Here a short note for you for the general pull request process that may help you down the line: https://hynek.me/articles/pull-requests-branch/

@sappelhoff sappelhoff merged commit 483a581 into sappelhoff:main Feb 9, 2024
9 checks passed
@sappelhoff
Copy link
Owner

just another note @nabilalibou if you have an ORCID account, may you please let me know your ID? And if you don't have an account (yet), I recommend that you get one, it'll always come in handy in a scientific career.

@nabilalibou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here a short note for you for the general pull request process that may help you down the line: https://hynek.me/articles/pull-requests-branch/

Thanks for the tips !

just another note @nabilalibou if you have an ORCID account, may you please let me know your ID? And if you don't have an account (yet), I recommend that you get one, it'll always come in handy in a scientific career.

I'm not necessarily aiming for a scientific career but you never know so here's my freshly created orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5869-9735 (should i add it myself in a future PR ?)

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Owner

Great, please add it in a new PR! 🎉 makes it easier for other people to find your work :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Possible to add an argument in find_bad_by_nan_flat() to change FLAT_THRESHOLD ?
2 participants