Change library from bluepy to Bleak (with async) #32
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RenierM26
changed the title
RenierM26
changed the title
|
Agree that Bleak is much better to work with. |
RenierM26
changed the title
-No passive scan mode available so I removed references.
RenierM26
force-pushed
the
bleak_api_conversion
branch
from
634ae10 to
f0aff75
Compare
|
Hi @Danielhiversen, The bleak conversion to pyswitchbot is finally ready for review. |
RenierM26
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bluepy development seems to be stale and plagued by custom code to underlying bluez component.
It might be worth it to rather use something like Bleak? The development is active and it's an asyncio library that seems to work much better.