build: 🔨 removed the reset-local recipe
#32
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
signekb
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2025
|
I was hoping to use it to clean up any left over files from different builds, because there was a few times I had an issue that was fixed after removing some of these files. But the different build files weren't always the issue, nor was the pattern matching able to get everything that needed to be removed without affecting other files. Plus, it was to remove any left over autogenerated files from the Python code in the website when we were using SPROUT_ROOT rather than assume everything is working directory. Which we don't do anymore. Basically, I think there are better solutions to the (rare) issue but it's very low priority right now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR removes the
reset-local, it wasn't working as I thought.This PR needs a quick review.