Skip to content

Release 23.35.1 #5265

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 52 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

Release 23.35.1 #5265

merged 52 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

forstisabella
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Panandhan22 and others added 30 commits May 12, 2023 15:39
### Email and User Token both fields are mapped in "Send custom behavioural event" mapping and sent over the event paylaod too. But the event is failing for delivery with "Payload validation error" as the email is not in valid format, why it is not taking the User token for validation?
Event payload should have the email with valid format or empty string, so that the user token will take precedence and can be validated. An invalid email will not pass mapping validation. Hence the event delivery is failing.
Hubspot Cloud Actions Destination supports Custom Behavioral Events and not Behavioral Events (Legacy).  This warning box directs users to the Hubspot Classic Destination for Behavioral Events (Legacy).
Added a resolution to mitigate the error.
…e.md

Co-authored-by: Niall Brennan <nbrennan@twilio.com>
…e.md

Co-authored-by: Niall Brennan <nbrennan@twilio.com>
…e.md

Co-authored-by: Niall Brennan <nbrennan@twilio.com>
…e.md

Co-authored-by: Niall Brennan <nbrennan@twilio.com>
Added the following faq that insert function can only be connected to one destination only.

"Can I connect an insert function to multiple destinations?

No, a destination insert function currently can be connected to one destinations only."
After reviewed in https://segment.atlassian.net/browse/KCS-555, change statement to the following:

"No, a Destination Insert Function currently can be connected to one destination only."
…Destination Filter

Customer are confused that sometimes they are still seeing events flowing through after adding Destination Filter. Added the following faq to indicate that retries could account for these events not filtered by Destination Filter

"Why do I see events being sent through after I just added a destination filter?

If Event Delivery page shows events have been retried, the retries could account for events that did not get filtered when the Destination Filter is just added. Such scenario can occur when an event was sent to the destination and encountered timeout error, and retries for the events are attempted. While the retries are attempted, and a Destination Filter is then added, these retries will not subject to the filtering since these are from the events sent before the Destination Filter is added."
Add mailchimp marketing dependency
Add faq that insert function can only be connected to one destination
- Move the word "to" from: 

You can load a buffered version of analytics.js that requires you call load explicitly > to < before analytics.js initiates any network activity.

You can load a buffered version of analytics.js that requires you > to < call load explicitly before analytics.js initiates any network activity.
Add faq that retries could account for events not filtered by Destination Filter
Warning about Behavior Events (Legacy)
rchinn1 and others added 21 commits August 26, 2023 10:53
*updated* RETRY Mixpanel legacy common error
User Token is not taken for validation as Email is not in valid format.
WebEngage Connection Mode override
Add tips regrading GTM 404 error
feat: add branch metrics to react native dest. plugin catalog
Update doc: iOS does not support destination middleware
Information about the available actions of SFMC destination.
@forstisabella forstisabella added the release For Release PRs label Aug 29, 2023
@forstisabella forstisabella requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2023 17:34
@forstisabella forstisabella requested a review from rchinn1 August 29, 2023 17:34
@forstisabella forstisabella merged commit 1a93fa0 into master Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release For Release PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.