You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Proposal: change gist:Specification textual description to say "A requirement or set of requirements to be satisfied by a material, design, product, or service."
Rationale:
Currently (through v9.5.0), gist:Specification is a subClassOf gist:Requriement. But its textual definition is: "A set of requirements to be satisfied by a material, design, product, or service." As such, it would most naturally seem to be a sub of Collection.
If we change to say it is "a requirement or set of requirements," we could be OK since Requirement and Collection are not disjoint. This allows us to keep our textual definition part about "… to be satisfied by a material, design, product, or service", which I like because it distinguishes it from a more general Requirement.
Proposal: change gist:Specification textual description to say "A requirement or set of requirements to be satisfied by a material, design, product, or service."
Rationale:
Currently (through v9.5.0), gist:Specification is a subClassOf gist:Requriement. But its textual definition is: "A set of requirements to be satisfied by a material, design, product, or service." As such, it would most naturally seem to be a sub of Collection.
If we change to say it is "a requirement or set of requirements," we could be OK since Requirement and Collection are not disjoint. This allows us to keep our textual definition part about "… to be satisfied by a material, design, product, or service", which I like because it distinguishes it from a more general Requirement.
(@mkumba supports this change)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: