Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

897 owl imports #976

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Oct 12, 2023
Merged

897 owl imports #976

merged 4 commits into from Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

uscholdm
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #897

@uscholdm uscholdm requested review from rjyounes, coltonglasgow and sa-bpelakh and removed request for coltonglasgow September 22, 2023 19:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@sa-bpelakh sa-bpelakh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Collaborator

@rjyounes rjyounes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I recommend a wording tweak in the release note.

docs/release_notes/897-owl-imports.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Tweaked wording in release notes

Co-authored-by: Rebecca Younes <rebecca.younes@semanticarts.com>
@rjyounes rjyounes merged commit 7d42609 into develop Oct 12, 2023
1 check passed
@rjyounes rjyounes deleted the 897-owl-imports branch October 12, 2023 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should all owl:imports refer to versioned IRIs?
3 participants