Skip to content

Conversation

AleksMat
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes 2 bugs regarding how EOTask names are handled in EOWorkflows.

@AleksMat AleksMat requested a review from iovsn January 22, 2020 16:30
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #178 into develop will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #178      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    79.73%   79.83%   +0.09%     
===========================================
  Files           45       45              
  Lines         4664     4671       +7     
===========================================
+ Hits          3719     3729      +10     
+ Misses         945      942       -3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
core/eolearn/core/eoworkflow.py 90.32% <100%> (+0.46%) ⬆️
.../eolearn/visualization/eoworkflow_visualization.py 93.33% <100%> (+5.45%) ⬆️
.../eolearn/visualization/eoexecutor_visualization.py 85.18% <0%> (+1.23%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 437b687...4deff50. Read the comment docs.

@iovsn iovsn merged commit f22b1fd into develop Jan 23, 2020
@AleksMat AleksMat deleted the bugfix/workflow-task-name-handling branch March 3, 2020 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants