-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BENCHMARKS] dataset comparison long read enhancement #209
[BENCHMARKS] dataset comparison long read enhancement #209
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lydia Buntrock <lydia.buntrock@fu-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Lydia Buntrock <lydia.buntrock@fu-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Lydia Buntrock <lydia.buntrock@fu-berlin.de>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #209 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.35% 98.34% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 18 18
Lines 850 846 -4
==========================================
- Hits 836 832 -4
Misses 14 14
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine!
So it looks like using just long reads still works much better than using both short and long reads combined? Also what is the difference between mate pair and paired-end? |
Signed-off-by: Lydia Buntrock <lydia.buntrock@fu-berlin.de>
779780e
to
c522483
Compare
dbe00cb
to
fa2f6dd
Compare
Signed-off-by: Lydia Buntrock <lydia.buntrock@fu-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Lydia Buntrock <lydia.buntrock@fu-berlin.de>
fa2f6dd
to
6e47b08
Compare
Yes, I had a discussion with Knut today aswell. And yes it just looks like out short read calling is very bad. |
Illumina Mate Pair
Illumina Paired End