HowTo write a View add constant_full

view_add_constant

We start with the first part of the implementation:

#include <range/v3/all.hpp>
#include <iostream>

template <typename urng_t>
//     requires (bool)ranges::InputRange<std::decay_t<urng_t>>() &&
//              std::is_same_v<std::decay_t<ranges::range_reference_t<std::decay_t<urng_t>>>, uint64_t>
class view_add_constant : public ranges::view_base
{

• For convenience we have included all of range-v3; in production code, you will want to actually select your required headers
• view_add_constant is a class template, because it needs to hold a reference to the original range it operates on; this range's type is passed in a as template parameter on which we enforce certain constraints. The most basic constraint is to enforce that it actually is an input range (we have commented this out for clang, but it works in GCC). The second constraint is that the input range is actually a range over uint64_t (possibly with reference or const).
• It is important to remember that we always deal with the range_reference_t (not the range_value_t) as dereferencing an iterator or calling [] on a range returns something of the range_reference_t not the range_value_t (the reference type may or may not actually contain a &).
• Please note that these constraints are specific to the view we are just creating. Other views will have different requirements on the reference type or even the range itself (e.g. it could be required to satisfy RandomAccessRange).
• We inherit from view_base which is an empty base class, because being derived from it signals to some library checks that this class is a really trying to be a view.

private:
    /* data members == "the state" */
    struct data_members_t
    {
        urng_t urange;
    };
    std::shared_ptr<data_members_t> data_members;

• The only data member we have is the reference to original range. It may look like we are saving a value here, but depending on the actual specialisation of the class template, urng_t may also contain & or const &.
• Why do we put the member variables inside an extra data structure stored in a smart pointer? A requirement of views is that they be copy-able in constant time, e.g. there should be no expensive operations like allocations during copying. An easy and good way to achieve implicit sharing of the data members is to put them inside a shared_ptr. Thereby all copies share the data_members and they get deleted with the last copy.
• In cases where we only hold a reference, this is not strictly required, but in those cases we still benefit from the fact that storing the reference inside the smart pointer makes our view default-constructible. This is another requirement of views – and having a top-level reference member prevents this. [Of course you can use a top-level pointer instead of a reference, but we don't like raw pointers anymore!]
• Other more complex views have more variables or "state" that they might be saving in this data_members.

    /* the iterator type */
    struct iterator_t : ranges::iterator_t<std::remove_reference_t<urng_t> const>
    {
        using base = ranges::iterator_t<std::remove_reference_t<urng_t> const>;

        iterator_t() = default;
        iterator_t(base const & b) : base{b} {}

        iterator_t operator++(int)
        {
            return static_cast<base&>(*this)++;
        }

        iterator_t & operator++()
        {
            ++static_cast<base&>(*this);
            return (*this);
        }

        uint64_t operator*() const
        {
            return *static_cast<base>(*this) + 42;
        }
    };

• Next we define an iterator type. Since view_add_constant needs to satisfy basic range requirements, you need to be able to iterate over it. In our case we can stay close to the original and inherit from the original iterator (plus const because we know we won't be changing it). For ranges::iterator_t<> to work we need to remove the reference from our type.
• For the iterator to satisfy the InputIterator concept we need to overload the increment operators so that their return type is of our class and not the base class. The actually important overload is of the dereference operation, i.e. actually getting the value. This is the place where we interject and call the base class's dereference, but then add the constant 42. Note that this changes the return type of the operation (reference_t); it used to be uint64_t const & (actually uint64_t &, but we added const above), now it's uint64_t → A new value is always generated as the result of adding 42.
• Note that more complex views might require drastically more complex iterators and it might make sense to define those externally. In general iterators involve a lot of boilerplate code, depending on the scope of your project it might make sense to add your own iterator base classes, using CRTP also helps re-use code and not having to create "non-functional" overloads.

We continue with the public interface:

public:
    /* member type definitions */
    using reference         = uint64_t;
    using const_reference   = uint64_t;
    using value_type        = uint64_t;

    using iterator          = iterator_t;
    using const_iterator    = iterator_t;

• First we define the member types that are required for input ranges. Of course our value type is uint64_t as we only operate on ranges over uint64_t and we are just adding a number. As we mentioned above, our iterator will always generate new values when dereferenced so the reference types are also value types.
• Note: Other view implementation might be agnostic of the actual value type, e.g. a view that just reverses the elements can do so independent of the type. In that case you pass the reference type through as using reference = range_reference_t<std::remove_reference_t<urng_t>>;. The value type would then be the reference type with any references stripped (using value_type = std::remove_cv_t<std::remove_reference_t<reference>>; and the const_reference type would be the reference type with const added (except if the reference type already is only a value_type in which case it is also just the value type, like in our above example)¹.
• The iterator type is just the type we defined above. Note that in views the iterator and const_iterator are always the same type. So for a view "foo" that can potentially modify the underlying range, a const version of "foo" does not protect the underlying range from modification! Instead create the view over a const version of the underlying range or use a wrapper like ranges::view::const_ that changes the reference type in the pipe to be const and thereby prevents modification.

    /* constructors and deconstructors */
    view_add_constant() = default;
    constexpr view_add_constant(view_add_constant const & rhs) = default;
    constexpr view_add_constant(view_add_constant && rhs) = default;
    constexpr view_add_constant & operator=(view_add_constant const & rhs) = default;
    constexpr view_add_constant & operator=(view_add_constant && rhs) = default;
    ~view_add_constant() = default;

    view_add_constant(urng_t && urange)
        : data_members{new data_members_t{std::forward<urng_t>(urange)}}
    {}

• The constructors are pretty much standard. We have an extra constructor that initialises our urange rom the value passed in. Note that this constructor covers all cases of input types (&, const &, &&), because more attributes can be stuck in the actual urng_t and because of reference collapsing

    /* begin and end */
    iterator begin() const
    {
        return std::cbegin(data_members->urange);
    }
    iterator cbegin() const
    {
        return begin();
    }

    iterator end() const
    {
        return std::cend(data_members->urange);
    }

    iterator cend() const
    {
        return end();
    }
};

• Finally we add begin and end iterators. Our iterator type can be created from the underlying iterator type, because we added a constructor above. And, as noted above, the const and non-const versions are the same.
• Note that if you want your view to be stronger that an input_range, e.g. be a sized_range or even a random_access_range, you might want to define additional member types (size_type, difference_type) and additional member functions (size(), operator[]...). Although strictly speaking the range "traits" are now deduced completely from the range's iterator so you don't need additional member functions on the range.

template <typename urng_t>
//     requires (bool)ranges::InputRange<std::decay_t<urng_t>>() &&
//              std::is_same_v<std::decay_t<ranges::range_reference_t<std::decay_t<urng_t>>>, uint64_t>
view_add_constant(urng_t &&) -> view_add_constant<urng_t>;

• We add a user-defined type deduction guide for our view.
• Class template argument deduction enables people to use your class template without having to manually specify the template parameter.
• In C++17 there is automatic deduction, as well, but we need user defined deduction here, if we want to cover both cases of urng_t (value tpye and reference type) and don't want to add more complex constructors.

static_assert((bool)ranges::InputRange<view_add_constant<std::vector<uint64_t>>>());
static_assert((bool)ranges::View<view_add_constant<std::vector<uint64_t>>>());

• Now is a good time to check whether your class satisfies the concepts it needs to meet. We have picked std::vector<uint64_t> as an underlying type, but others would work, too.
• If the checks fail, you have done something wrong somewhere. The compilers don't yet tell you why certain concept checks fail (especially when using the range library's hacked concept implementation) so you need to add more basic concept checks and try which ones succeed and which break to get hints on which requirements you are failing. A likely candidate is your iterator not meeting the InputIterator concept.

_{¹ As new values (rvalues) are returned adding const makes no sense, in fact compilers warn if you do.}

add_constant_fn

Off to our second type definition:

struct add_constant_fn
{
    template <typename urng_t>
//         requires (bool)ranges::InputRange<std::decay_t<urng_t>>() &&
//                  std::is_same_v<std::decay_t<ranges::range_reference_t<std::decay_t<urng_t>>>, uint64_t>
    auto operator()(urng_t && urange) const
    {
        return view_add_constant{std::forward<urng_t>(urange)};
    }

    template <typename urng_t>
//         requires (bool)ranges::InputRange<std::decay_t<urng_t>>() &&
//                  std::is_same_v<std::decay_t<ranges::range_reference_t<std::decay_t<urng_t>>>, uint64_t>
    friend auto operator|(urng_t && urange, add_constant_fn const &)
    {
        return view_add_constant{std::forward<urng_t>(urange)};
    }

};

• The first operator facilitates something similar to the constructor, it enables traditional usage of the view in the so called function-style: auto v = view::add_constant(other_range);.
• The second operator enables the pipe notation: auto v = other_range | view::add_constant;. It needs to be friend or a free function and takes two arguments (both sides of the operation).

view::add_constant

Finally we add an instance of add_constant_fn to namespace view:

namespace view
{

add_constant_fn const add_constant;

}

If you prepend all of the above to the test on HowTo write a View it should work.