-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate the refs exists #164
Validate the refs exists #164
Conversation
@ricardozanini To solve the unit test that PR (involve the default values of |
e6f724b
to
a7ca16f
Compare
#159 should be merged soon. |
@ribeiromiranda any updates on this one? |
@ricardozanini Yes, but I didn't push it because there's a lot of unit testing to fix. |
a7ca16f
to
aecd4f3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ribeiromiranda, this is awesome work. Many many thanks for this. I imagine you're still working on it, right?
Apart from that, can you join the CNCF Slack, #serverless-workflow-sdk channel? I need to talk to you. Just send me a PM. :)
} | ||
|
||
func init() { | ||
// TODO: create states graph to complex check |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we have a follow-up issue to have it documented?
93758a2
to
bd56202
Compare
@ribeiromiranda are you still working on this, right? Please let me know when ready so we can have a final look + merge. |
@ricardozanini No more changes. |
Can you take a look at the CI errors, then? So we can merge after it. cc @spolti |
@ricardozanini @spolti CI errors fixed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really nice :)
Waiting for #178 |
…etries, etc) exists Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
…tionType Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
…n suggestions Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
… description Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <andre@galgo.tech>
280edce
to
d58baa1
Compare
@ricardozanini Made the rebase with the main branch. |
Add validator with context to validate the refs (functions, events, retries, etc) exists