Remove workflowId from Parallel state

[jorgenj]

Remove workflowId from Parallel state (use subFlow actions instead).

Signed-off-by: Jorgen Johnson jorgenj@gmail.com

Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!

Please specify parts this PR updates:

• [ ✅ ] Specification
• [ ✅ ] Schema
• [ ✅ ] Examples
• Extensions
• Roadmap
• Use Cases
• Community
• TCK
• Other

What this PR does / why we need it:

I found some updates that I missed in the recent subFlowRef change that should be cleaned up. Apologies for missing this in the previous PR.

Special notes for reviewers:

Additional information (if needed):

[tsurdilo]

@jorgenj if we are removing something from the DSL (workflowid for parallel state branches) we should mention it in the roadmap readme.md, please add it there.

Also, in the specification.md for SubflowRef definition it does not say atm that it can also be a string type, just noticed, could we update that as well?

Last thing I noticed was that idk how this slipped review but

"waitForCompletion": {
              "type": "boolean",
              "default": false,
              "description": "Workflow execution must wait for sub-workflow to finish before continuing"
            }

the default value of this should be true please. Doing anything async should be explicit choice by user.

[tsurdilo]

@jorgenj if its possible let's do a separate pr for removing the workflowid from parallel state branches. it would allow us to track this change and discuss it in meeting.

[tsurdilo]

waitForCompletion default value fixed here: #361

[jorgenj]

@jorgenj if its possible let's do a separate pr for removing the workflowid from parallel state branches. it would allow us to track this change and discuss it in meeting.

@tsurdilo There's really not much in this PR except for that, so I renamed this PR to call it that and added the item in roadmap.

[tsurdilo]

@jorgenj thanks for this,
i can add the specification.md update to subflowRef in a separate pr (type string is not explained atm)

[tsurdilo]

"Remove" - I'll fix in a separate pr cause I think this needs to go in with us not having a meet for a while

[tsurdilo]

Will go ahead and merge this . no need to wait long time for our next meet for it