Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove RawLayoutHTMLInputElementHelpers. #8294

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2015

Conversation

Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

@Ms2ger Ms2ger commented Nov 2, 2015

Review on Reviewable

@highfive highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Nov 2, 2015
@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Nov 2, 2015

warning Warning warning

  • These commits modify unsafe code. Please review it carefully!

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Nov 2, 2015

@bors-servo: r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 0dacd33 has been approved by jdm

@highfive highfive added S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. and removed S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. labels Nov 2, 2015
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 0dacd33 with merge 5c11c88...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2015
Remove RawLayoutHTMLInputElementHelpers.



<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8294)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - android, gonk, linux-dev, linux-rel, mac-dev-ref-unit, mac-rel-css, mac-rel-wpt

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 0dacd33 into servo:master Nov 2, 2015
@Ms2ger Ms2ger deleted the layout-input branch November 4, 2015 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants