Skip to content
experiments with Linux namespaces and sudoers
Shell Python
Branch: master
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.

Linux namespace experiments

Some scripts to evaluate sudoers files inside a Linux namespace.

$ cat dummy
Host_Alias HELLO = world[1-3]
root    HELLO=(ALL)     ALL
$ sudo ./ -u root -h world1 ./dummy
User root may run the following commands on world1:
    (ALL) ALL
$ sudo ./ -u root -h world2 ./dummy
User root may run the following commands on world2:
    (ALL) ALL
$ sudo ./ -u root -h world3 ./dummy
User root may run the following commands on world3:
    (ALL) ALL
$ sudo ./ -u root -h world4 ./dummy
User root is not allowed to run sudo on world4.

I'm having trouble supporting sudo -l -U <user> because creating a --user namespace causes problems with permissions when trying to execute the sudo binary from inside the namespace.

  • unshare+

A Python script that adds --uid-map "0 1000 2" to Bash's unshare.


If your sudoers file has lots of aliases, wildcards, etc., the visudo command can validate them (or format them with JSON if your copy of visudo has the -x flag). However, it won't resolve the indirection. Here's what I mean:

$ cat test-sudoers-file
Runas_Alias DANGEROUS = root
User_Alias INNOCENT = sevagh
INNOCENT remotehost = (DANGEROUS) /bin/sh
$ visudo -cf ./test-sudoers-file
./test-sudoers-file: parsed OK

visudo will not tell you that sevagh can run sh as root. The only way to find that out is to eyeball the file (easy when the file is small but it doesn't scale), or run sudo -U sevagh -h remotehost -l on remotehost to get the reality of sudoers. From man sudo:

-l, --list If no command is specified, list the allowed (and forbidden) commands for the invoking user (or the user specified by the -U option) on the current host. A longer list format is used if this option is specified multiple times and the security policy supports a verbose output format.

Along with the options -U user and -h host, you can hypothetically iterate over all of users and hosts and run sudo -U user -h host -l to get a real idea of who can run what where.


A Linux namespace (man namespace) lets you isolate system resources in a container:

  Namespace   Constant          Isolates
   Cgroup      CLONE_NEWCGROUP   Cgroup root directory
   IPC         CLONE_NEWIPC      System V IPC, POSIX message queues
   Network     CLONE_NEWNET      Network devices, stacks, ports, etc.
   Mount       CLONE_NEWNS       Mount points
   PID         CLONE_NEWPID      Process IDs
   User        CLONE_NEWUSER     User and group IDs
   UTS         CLONE_NEWUTS      Hostname and NIS domain name

This list contains everything we need - CLONE_NEWNS can help us take test-sudoers-file and mount it over /etc/sudoers. CLONE_NEWUTS can help us change the hostname of the namespace to test various permutations of sudo -h host. CLONE_NEWUSER can help us create a bunch of fake user accounts to run sudo -U user that are not valid users in the parent.

I'll be using the Bash command unshare to start constructing a proof-of-concept for a namespace sudoers evaluator. First, we'll launch unshare with no options:

sevagh $ unshare
sevagh $ ps
  PID TTY          TIME CMD
18252 pts/1    00:00:00 bash
19411 pts/1    00:00:00 bash
19446 pts/1    00:00:00 ps
sevagh $ echo $$
sevagh $ sudo -l
[sudo] password for sevagh:
User sevagh may run the following commands on sevagh-t450:
    (ALL) ALL

Seems like a working little container, but with no isolation - it's inheriting all of my laptop's stuff.

Isolating /etc/sudoers

Let's try the CLONE_NEWNS option for the mount namespace:

sevagh $ unshare --mount
unshare: unshare failed: Operation not permitted

Why? Who knows - I suspected SELinux but setenforce 0 didn't help. Let's add CLONE_NEWUSER via the --user flag:

sevagh $ echo "hello" > dummy
sevagh $ unshare --mount --user
nfsnobody $ id
uid=65534(nfsnobody) gid=65534(nfsnobody) groups=65534(nfsnobody) context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
nfsnobody $ echo "wow" > dummy
nfsnobody $ logout
sevagh $ cat dummy

Now something's happening - but without actually bind mounting the file, we're still modifying it in the parent. Let's try it again but with some tmpfs and bind mounting:

sevagh $ unshare --mount --user
nfsnobody $ mktemp -d --tmpdir=/tmp
nfsnobody $ mount -t tmpfs namespace-mnt /tmp/tmp.d1P7Xa6Txs
mount: only root can use "--types" option

I want to be root inside my namespace. Since doing all of the mounting and sudo commands and user creation will require root, but the namespace is isolated from my laptop, it shouldn't be a problem to be root inside the namespace. Let's use --map-root-user:

-r, --map-root-user Run the program only after the current effective user and group IDs have been mapped to the superuser UID and GID in the newly created user namespace. This makes it possible to conveniently gain capabilities needed to manage various aspects of the newly created namespaces (such as configuring interfaces in the network namespace or mounting filesystems in the mount namespace) even when run unprivileged.

I bolded the relevant part - this is what I want. When running unshare unprivileged, be privileged inside it.

sevagh $ unshare --mount --map-root-user
root $ cat /proc/self/uid_map
         0       1000          1

To understand the uid_map file, this means 0 in the container will map to 1000 in the parent (with a range of 1 starting from the initial value) - so just a single uid, 1000, will be mapped.

We'll try mounting again:

sevagh $ unshare --map-root-user --mount
root $ mount -t tmpfs namespace-mnt $(mktemp -d --tmpdir=/tmp)
root $ df -h
Filesystem               Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/fedora-root   49G   15G   32G  33% /
tmpfs                    3.8G     0  3.8G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
devtmpfs                 3.8G     0  3.8G   0% /dev
tmpfs                    3.8G   12M  3.8G   1% /dev/shm
tmpfs                    3.8G  2.0M  3.8G   1% /run
tmpfs                    768M   16K  768M   1% /run/user/42
tmpfs                    768M  6.4M  762M   1% /run/user/1000
tmpfs                    3.8G  168K  3.8G   1% /tmp
/dev/sda1                976M  218M  692M  24% /boot
/dev/mapper/fedora-home  177G   12G  156G   7% /home
namespace-mnt            3.8G     0  3.8G   0% /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj
root $ echo "hello" > /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/fakefile

Let's go outside of the namespace and look for the same mount:

sevagh $ df -h
Filesystem               Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs                 3.8G     0  3.8G   0% /dev
tmpfs                    3.8G   12M  3.8G   1% /dev/shm
tmpfs                    3.8G  2.0M  3.8G   1% /run
tmpfs                    3.8G     0  3.8G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/fedora-root   49G   15G   32G  33% /
tmpfs                    3.8G  168K  3.8G   1% /tmp
/dev/sda1                976M  218M  692M  24% /boot
/dev/mapper/fedora-home  177G   12G  156G   7% /home
tmpfs                    768M   16K  768M   1% /run/user/42
tmpfs                    768M  6.4M  762M   1% /run/user/1000
sevagh $ ls /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/
sevagh $ sudo ls /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/

This is great - the namespace mount is protected from the parent. This means that in this namespace, if we use a bind mount over /etc/sudoers, the parent's real /etc/sudoers file won't be affected. Back to the namespace:

root $ echo "fake" > /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/sudoers-copy
root $ cat /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/sudoers-copy
root $ ls -latrh /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/sudoers-copy
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5 Aug  2 17:43 /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/sudoers-copy
root $ mount --bind /tmp/tmp.nQFaCJItdj/sudoers-copy /etc/sudoers
root $ cat /etc/sudoers

Now we have the /etc/sudoers file isolated - that's building block #1 of a namespace-based sudoers evaluator.

Executing the sudo binary

We run into trouble when running the sudo binary:

sevagh $ unshare --map-root-user --mount
root $ sudo
sudo: error in /etc/sudo.conf, line 0 while loading plugin "sudoers_policy"
sudo: /usr/libexec/sudo/ must be owned by uid 0
sudo: fatal error, unable to load plugins

We can use the above mount trick to copy /usr/libexec/sudo/ somewhere, fiddle with its bits, mount bind over the real one, and off to the races:

sevagh $ unshare --map-root-user --mount
root $ cp /usr/libexec/sudo/ /tmp/copy-of-sudoers
root $ mount --bind /tmp/co^C
root $ chown root:root /tmp/copy-of-sudoers
root $ mount --bind -o exec /tmp/copy-of-sudoers /usr/libexec/sudo/
root $ sudo
sudo: PERM_SUDOERS: setresuid(-1, 1, -1): Invalid argument
sudo: no valid sudoers sources found, quitting
sudo: unable to initialize policy plugin

The uid_map saga

What's happening here is that I'm missing uid 1. Grep for PERM_SUDOERS in the sudo codebase (here's a convenient GitHub mirror) and you'll see comments like //Assume that uid 1 exists because why wouldn't it - well, because we're in a fucking namespace, that's why.

If you recall, --map-root-user produced a uid_map with 0 1000 1, meaning 0 in the container mapped to 1000 in the host. I need 1 in the container to map to something - 0 1000 2 would imply that 1 in the container maps to 1001 on my host. Since I, sevagh, am uid 1000, I don't have permission to give my namespace 1001. I need to be root - which I want to avoid.

Another option seems to be defining multiple mappings e.g. 0 1000 1\n1 1000 1. Let's try it. Since defining a uid_map is a one-time operation and --map-root-user already defines one, we'll go with --user to be able to define a new mapping:

sevagh $ unshare --user --mount
nfsnobody $ cat /proc/self/uid_map
nfsnobody $ echo $$

Let's write to it's uid_map first, for a sanity check:

# outside namespace (tmux split-pane - parent implications?)
sevagh:~ $ echo "0 1000 1" > /proc/31867/uid_map

# inside namespace
nfsnobody $ cat /proc/self/uid_map
nfsnobody $ echo $$
nfsnobody $ cat /proc/self/uid_map
         0       1000          1

Now let's try the mapping we actually wanted:

sevagh $ printf "0 1000 1\n1 1000 1" > /proc/32083/uid_map
-bash: printf: write error: Operation not permitted
sevagh $ su -c 'printf "0 1000 1\n1 1000 1" > /proc/32083/uid_map'
bash: line 0: printf: write error: Operation not permitted

It's probably more due to malformed syntax (i.e. not being able to map the same uid twice). Let's go with the original plan of 0 1000 2:

sevagh $ printf "0 1000 2" > /proc/32083/uid_map
-bash: printf: write error: Operation not permitted
sevagh:~ $ su -c 'printf "0 1000 2" > /proc/32203/uid_map'

It worked:

nfsnobody:~ $ cat /proc/self/uid_map
         0       1000          2
nfsnobody:~ $ cp /usr/libexec/sudo/ /tmp/copy-of-sudoers
nfsnobody:~ $ chown 0 /tmp/copy-of-sudoers
nfsnobody:~ $ mount --bind -o exec /tmp/copy-of-sudoers /usr/libexec/sudo/sudoe
nfsnobody:~ $ sudo
sudo: unable to change to root gid: Invalid argument
sudo: unable to initialize policy plugin

We need to involve gid map:

sevagh:~ $ su -c 'printf "0 1000 2" > /proc/32203/gid_map'

Back to the namespace:

nfsnobody:~ $ sudo
sudo: /etc/sudoers is owned by uid 65534, should be 0
sudo: no valid sudoers sources found, quitting
sudo: unable to initialize policy plugin

So close:

nfsnobody $ vim fake-sudoers
nfsnobody $ cat fake-sudoers
Runas_Alias DANGEROUS = root
User_Alias INNOCENT = sevagh
INNOCENT remotehost = (DANGEROUS) /bin/sh
nfsnobody $
nfsnobody $
nfsnobody $ mount --bind -o exec ./fake-sudoers /etc/sudoers
nfsnobody $ chown 0:0 /etc/sudoers
nfsnobody $ sudo
sudo: setgroups(): Invalid argument
sudo: setgroups(): Invalid argument
You can’t perform that action at this time.