Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump dotenv-rails from 2.5.0 to 2.6.0 #372

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2019

Conversation

dependabot-preview[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Bumps dotenv-rails from 2.5.0 to 2.6.0.

Changelog

Sourced from dotenv-rails's changelog.

2.6.0 - January 5, 2019

  • Added require keys method to raise if not defined (#354)
  • Use latest Ruby version on CI (#356, #363)
  • Clarify variable hierarchy in README.md (#358)
  • Use SVG Travis CI badge (#360)
Commits
  • 169d5f3 Merge pull request #368 from issei-m/patch-1
  • 85c0903 Fix typo in README.md
  • 6fbf71f Merge pull request #365 from bkeepers/release-2.6.0
  • d4db5f1 Fix Travis rubygems issue
  • 292f548 Release version 2.6.0, update Changelog
  • 197c2ff Merge pull request #363 from koic/use_latest_rubies_on_travis_ci
  • 9ea1e66 Use the latest Rubies on Travis CI
  • d749366 Merge pull request #360 from olivierlacan/patch-1
  • ee712a3 Merge pull request #358 from adarsh/patch-1
  • 3f7a061 Use SVG Travis CI badge
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot ignore this [patch|minor|major] version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor/major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot badge me will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme

Additionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot dashboard:

  • Update frequency (including time of day and day of week)
  • Automerge options (never/patch/minor, and dev/runtime dependencies)
  • Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time)
  • Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
  • Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)

Finally, you can contact us by mentioning @dependabot.

Bumps [dotenv-rails](https://github.com/bkeepers/dotenv) from 2.5.0 to 2.6.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/bkeepers/dotenv/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/bkeepers/dotenv/blob/master/Changelog.md)
- [Commits](bkeepers/dotenv@v2.5.0...v2.6.0)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.924% when pulling 7ee6970 on dependabot/bundler/dotenv-rails-2.6.0 into 97ccd88 on master.

@jszwedko jszwedko merged commit f4329c3 into master Feb 2, 2019
@jszwedko jszwedko deleted the dependabot/bundler/dotenv-rails-2.6.0 branch February 2, 2019 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants