Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

plot accuracy & time vs. iteration # #74

Open
jovo opened this issue Aug 5, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

plot accuracy & time vs. iteration # #74

jovo opened this issue Aug 5, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jovo
Copy link
Collaborator

jovo commented Aug 5, 2015

for accuracy, use accuracy of both E step and M step
(don't count computing accuracy in the time calculation)

@yangyutu

@jovo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jovo commented Aug 25, 2015

how is this coming along?
@vincentliuk @yangyutu

once this is done, let's chat again?

@yangyutu
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello, Josh,

I am getting confused. Are we supposed to make a new figure or update some
previous figure?

Thanks.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:09 AM, joshua vogelstein <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

how is this coming along?
@vincentliuk https://github.com/vincentliuk @yangyutu
https://github.com/yangyutu

once this is done, let's chat again?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#74 (comment).

@jovo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jovo commented Aug 25, 2015

new fig, 3 lines:
parameter accuracy vs. iteration
time vs. iteration
prediction accuracy vs. iteration.

now that we understand time within iterations,
we want to understand accuracy and time across iterations.

note: please include iteration 0, ie, the initialization phase.

is that clear?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Yuguang Yang notifications@github.com
wrote:

Hello, Josh,

I am getting confused. Are we supposed to make a new figure or update some
previous figure?

Thanks.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:09 AM, joshua vogelstein <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

how is this coming along?
@vincentliuk https://github.com/vincentliuk @yangyutu
https://github.com/yangyutu

once this is done, let's chat again?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#74 (comment).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#74 (comment).

the glass is all full: half water, half air.
openconnecto.me, jovo.me, office hours
https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=vk2j3ugqcitvq223g7ivvq4hqo%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/New_York

@yangyutu
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello, Josh, I have three questions:
(1) time means computational time?
(2) you said "use accuracy of both E step and M step", then for each iteration, I need to plot the accuracy for both E step and M step? Then there will be 5 lines rather than 3.
(3) which data shall I use? I am planning to use the low dimensional setting as in Figure 1 for this plot.

@jovo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jovo commented Aug 25, 2015

yes.
ok
good start.
thanks.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Yuguang Yang notifications@github.com
wrote:

Hello, Josh, I have three questions:
(1) time means computational time?
(2) you said "use accuracy of both E step and M step", then for each
iteration, I need to plot the accuracy for both E step and M step? Then
there will be 5 lines rather than 3.
(3) which data shall I use? I am planning to use the low dimensional
setting as in Figure 1 for this plot.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#74 (comment).

the glass is all full: half water, half air.
openconnecto.me, jovo.me, office hours
https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=vk2j3ugqcitvq223g7ivvq4hqo%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/New_York

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants