Feature/coderabbit pr test 4 #11
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new React component for personalized greetings, a time-based greeting utility function, and corresponding unit tests. Additionally, a detailed technical security and code review evaluation document for the CodeRabbit and Bitbucket integration is added, outlining architecture, security, compliance, and best practices. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GreetingComponent
participant getGreetingTime
User->>GreetingComponent: Render with name
GreetingComponent->>getGreetingTime: Call with hour
getGreetingTime-->>GreetingComponent: Return greeting string
GreetingComponent-->>User: Display greeting with uppercase name
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm error Exit handler never called! ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
coderabbitsecurity.md (3)
101-101: Fix compound word spelling."Anti-patterns" should be hyphenated as one compound word.
-Checks for code quality, style, complexity, and anti-patterns. +Checks for code quality, style, complexity, and anti-patterns.
13-17: Add language specification to code blocks.The markdown fenced code blocks should specify a language for better rendering and syntax highlighting.
-``` +```mermaid [User] → [Bitbucket OAuth Consent] → [CodeRabbit App] | | +----> [Access Token] <-----------+ -``` +``` -``` +```mermaid [PR Opened] → [Webhook] → [CodeRabbit Review] | | +----> [Inline Feedback] → [Dev Fixes] → [Re-review] -``` +```Also applies to: 90-94
12-12: Use proper heading format instead of emphasis.The bolded text should use heading format instead of emphasis for better document structure.
-**Diagram: OAuth Integration Flow** +#### Diagram: OAuth Integration Flow -**Diagram: Automated Review Workflow** +#### Diagram: Automated Review WorkflowAlso applies to: 89-89
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
coderabbitsecurity.md(1 hunks)src/Greeting.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/Greeting.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/Greeting.test.tsx (1)
src/Greeting.tsx (2)
Greeting(3-6)getGreetingTime(9-14)
🪛 LanguageTool
coderabbitsecurity.md
[misspelling] ~101-~101: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...or code quality, style, complexity, and anti-patterns. - Customizable rulesets per project/te...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_ANTI_PATTERNS)
[grammar] ~104-~104: You’ve repeated a verb. Did you mean to only write one of them?
Context: ...oject/team. ### Security Vulnerability Scanning - Scans for OWASP Top 10, SAST vulnerabilities,...
(REPEATED_VERBS)
[uncategorized] ~109-~109: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...scanning. ### AI-Powered Suggestions - Contextual code improvements, refactoring, and bes...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_OF)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
coderabbitsecurity.md
12-12: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
13-13: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
89-89: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
90-90: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
| export function Greeting({ name }: { name: string }) { | ||
| // Introduce a bug: if name is empty, it should say 'Guest', but this is not handled | ||
| return <h2>Hello, {name.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the empty name handling bug.
The component doesn't handle the case when name is an empty string, which should default to 'Guest' as mentioned in the comment.
Apply this diff to fix the empty name handling:
export function Greeting({ name }: { name: string }) {
- // Introduce a bug: if name is empty, it should say 'Guest', but this is not handled
- return <h2>Hello, {name.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;
+ const displayName = name.trim() || 'Guest';
+ return <h2>Hello, {displayName.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function Greeting({ name }: { name: string }) { | |
| // Introduce a bug: if name is empty, it should say 'Guest', but this is not handled | |
| return <h2>Hello, {name.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>; | |
| } | |
| export function Greeting({ name }: { name: string }) { | |
| const displayName = name.trim() || 'Guest'; | |
| return <h2>Hello, {displayName.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.tsx around lines 3 to 6, the Greeting component does not handle
the case when the name prop is an empty string, which should default to 'Guest'.
Fix this by checking if the name is empty or falsy and use 'Guest' instead
before calling toUpperCase, ensuring the greeting always displays a valid name.
| export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string { | ||
| if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning'; | ||
| if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon'; | ||
| if (hour < 24) return 'Good night'; // Bug: should be 'Good evening' for 18-21, 'Good night' for 22-23 | ||
| return 'Invalid hour'; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the time-based greeting logic.
The function incorrectly returns "Good night" for all hours between 18-23. It should distinguish between "Good evening" (18-21) and "Good night" (22-23).
Apply this diff to fix the greeting logic:
export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string {
if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning';
if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon';
- if (hour < 24) return 'Good night'; // Bug: should be 'Good evening' for 18-21, 'Good night' for 22-23
+ if (hour < 22) return 'Good evening';
+ if (hour < 24) return 'Good night';
return 'Invalid hour';
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string { | |
| if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning'; | |
| if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon'; | |
| if (hour < 24) return 'Good night'; // Bug: should be 'Good evening' for 18-21, 'Good night' for 22-23 | |
| return 'Invalid hour'; | |
| } | |
| export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string { | |
| if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning'; | |
| if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon'; | |
| if (hour < 22) return 'Good evening'; | |
| if (hour < 24) return 'Good night'; | |
| return 'Invalid hour'; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.tsx around lines 9 to 14, the getGreetingTime function
incorrectly returns "Good night" for hours 18 to 23. Update the logic to return
"Good evening" for hours 18 to 21 and "Good night" for hours 22 to 23, ensuring
the correct greeting is returned based on the hour.
| test('Greeting component renders with name', () => { | ||
| render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CodeRabbit!/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('Greeting component renders with name in uppercase', () => { | ||
| render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CODERABBIT!/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test coverage for empty name handling.
The existing tests look good, but you should add a test case to verify the empty name handling once the bug in the Greeting component is fixed.
Add this test case:
+test('Greeting component handles empty name', () => {
+ render(<Greeting name="" />);
+ expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, GUEST!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
+});
+
+test('Greeting component handles whitespace-only name', () => {
+ render(<Greeting name=" " />);
+ expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, GUEST!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
+});🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.test.tsx around lines 4 to 12, add a new test case to verify how
the Greeting component handles an empty name prop. This test should render the
component with an empty string as the name and assert the expected output or
behavior for that scenario once the bug in the Greeting component is fixed. This
will ensure coverage for empty name handling.
| test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => { | ||
| expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning'); | ||
| expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon'); | ||
| expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good night'); // This will pass, but is a logic bug | ||
| expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour'); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update test to reflect correct greeting logic.
The test at line 17 expects "Good night" for hour 20, which perpetuates the logic bug. After fixing the getGreetingTime function, this test should be updated to expect "Good evening".
Apply this diff to fix the test:
test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => {
expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon');
- expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good night'); // This will pass, but is a logic bug
+ expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good evening');
+ expect(getGreetingTime(23)).toBe('Good night');
expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour');
});🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.test.tsx between lines 14 and 19, the test expects "Good night"
for hour 20, which is incorrect based on the updated greeting logic. Change the
expected value for getGreetingTime(20) from "Good night" to "Good evening" to
align the test with the corrected function behavior.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests