Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
152 changes: 152 additions & 0 deletions coderabbitsecurity.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
# CodeRabbit + Bitbucket Integration: Technical Security & Code Review Evaluation

---

## 1. Bitbucket Integration Architecture

### Authentication & Authorization Flow
- Uses OAuth 2.0 for secure authentication between CodeRabbit and Bitbucket.
- Admin grants CodeRabbit access via Bitbucket's app authorization screen.
- Scopes are limited to required permissions (e.g., repo read/write, PR access).

**Diagram: OAuth Integration Flow**
```
[User] → [Bitbucket OAuth Consent] → [CodeRabbit App]
| |
+----> [Access Token] <-----------+
```

### Repository Access Mechanisms
- CodeRabbit uses Bitbucket REST APIs to fetch PRs, code diffs, and comments.
- Webhooks are set up for PR events (opened, updated, merged).
- Access is scoped to only authorized repositories.

### Supported Bitbucket Features & Limitations
- **Supported:**
- Pull request review and inline comments
- Status checks and review approvals
- Integration with Bitbucket Pipelines
- **Limitations:**
- No direct support for Bitbucket Server (if cloud-only)
- Some advanced branch permissions may not be fully respected

---

## 2. Data Privacy & Security Assessment

### Data Storage Policies & Locations
- CodeRabbit stores minimal metadata (PR IDs, review status) in encrypted cloud storage (e.g., AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Code content is processed in-memory or stored temporarily for review duration only.
- Data residency options may be available for enterprise customers.

### AI Model Training & Data Usage
- By default, user code is not used for AI model training unless explicit opt-in is provided.
- Training datasets are anonymized and scrubbed of PII/secrets.
- No code is shared with third parties without consent.

### Data Retention & Deletion Policies
- PR data and metadata are retained only as long as necessary for review/audit.
- Users can request deletion of all stored data via dashboard or support.
- Automated purging of stale data after a configurable retention period.

### Encryption Methods
- **At Rest:** AES-256 encryption for all stored data.
- **In Transit:** TLS 1.2+ for all API and webhook communications.

---

## 3. Code Review Security Features

### Handling of Sensitive Data
- CodeRabbit scans for credentials, tokens, and PII in code and flags them in reviews.
- Sensitive data is masked in logs and reports.

### Access Control & Permissions
- Follows Bitbucket's permission model (repo, branch, PR-level access).
- Only authorized users can trigger reviews or view results.
- Supports SSO/SAML for enterprise access control.

### Compliance with Industry Standards
- GDPR-compliant data handling and user rights.
- SOC 2 controls for data security, availability, and confidentiality.
- Regular third-party security assessments and penetration tests.

### Third-Party Integration Security
- All integrations (e.g., Slack, Jira) use OAuth or signed webhooks.
- No sensitive data is shared with third parties without explicit user action.

---

## 4. Code Review Process

### Automated Review Workflow
1. Developer opens a PR in Bitbucket.
2. Webhook triggers CodeRabbit review.
3. CodeRabbit fetches code diff, runs static analysis, and posts inline comments.
4. Developer addresses feedback; CodeRabbit re-reviews on update.
5. Review status and metrics are updated in Bitbucket.

**Diagram: Automated Review Workflow**
```
[PR Opened] → [Webhook] → [CodeRabbit Review]
| |
+----> [Inline Feedback] → [Dev Fixes] → [Re-review]
```

### Supported Languages & Frameworks
- Supports major languages: Python, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, C#, Go, Ruby, etc.
- Framework-specific rules for React, Django, Spring, .NET, Node.js, etc.

### Static Code Analysis
- Checks for code quality, style, complexity, and anti-patterns.
- Customizable rulesets per project/team.

### Security Vulnerability Scanning
- Scans for OWASP Top 10, SAST vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, and dependency issues.
- Integrates with Snyk or similar tools for dependency scanning.

### AI-Powered Suggestions
- Contextual code improvements, refactoring, and best practice recommendations.
- Learns from team review patterns for tailored feedback.

---

## 5. Audit & Monitoring

### Activity Logging & Audit Trails
- All review actions, comments, and status changes are logged with timestamps and user IDs.
- Immutable audit logs for compliance and forensics.

### Monitoring Security Events
- Real-time monitoring for suspicious activity (e.g., unauthorized access, excessive data export).
- Alerts for failed logins, permission changes, and integration events.

### Compliance Reporting
- Exportable reports for audit/compliance (GDPR, SOC 2, etc.).
- Dashboard for review metrics, security findings, and remediation status.

### Incident Response Procedures
- 24/7 monitoring and incident response team.
- Documented playbooks for breach detection, containment, and notification.
- User notification and support for data incidents.

---

## Security Recommendations
- Enable SSO/SAML and enforce strong authentication for all users.
- Regularly review and limit CodeRabbit's access scopes in Bitbucket.
- Use custom rules to flag sensitive data and enforce secure coding standards.
- Periodically export and review audit logs for unusual activity.
- Stay updated on CodeRabbit and Bitbucket security advisories.

---

## References
- [CodeRabbit Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs)
- [Bitbucket OAuth Guide](https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/oauth-2/)
- [Bitbucket Webhooks](https://support.atlassian.com/bitbucket-cloud/docs/manage-webhooks/)
- [OWASP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/)
- [GDPR Compliance](https://gdpr.eu/)
- [SOC 2 Overview](https://www.aicpa.org/resources/article/soc-2-report)

---
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions src/Greeting.test.tsx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
import { Greeting, getGreetingTime } from './Greeting';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';

test('Greeting component renders with name', () => {
render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />);
expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CodeRabbit!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

test('Greeting component renders with name in uppercase', () => {
render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />);
expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CODERABBIT!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
Comment on lines +4 to +12
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consolidate redundant tests and add missing test cases.

The two tests for the Greeting component are redundant - both verify the same uppercase rendering behavior. Additionally, there's no test for the empty name scenario.

Apply this diff to improve the test coverage:

-test('Greeting component renders with name', () => {
-  render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />);
-  expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CodeRabbit!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
-});
-
 test('Greeting component renders with name in uppercase', () => {
   render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />);
   expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CODERABBIT!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
 });
+
+test('Greeting component handles empty name', () => {
+  render(<Greeting name="" />);
+  expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, GUEST!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
+});
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test('Greeting component renders with name', () => {
render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />);
expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CodeRabbit!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('Greeting component renders with name in uppercase', () => {
render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />);
expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CODERABBIT!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('Greeting component renders with name in uppercase', () => {
render(<Greeting name="CodeRabbit" />);
expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, CODERABBIT!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('Greeting component handles empty name', () => {
render(<Greeting name="" />);
expect(screen.getByText(/Hello, GUEST!/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.test.tsx around lines 4 to 12, the two tests are redundant as
both check for uppercase rendering of the name. Consolidate them into a single
test that verifies the component renders the name correctly in uppercase.
Additionally, add a new test case to check the component's behavior when the
name prop is empty, ensuring proper handling of that scenario.


test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => {
expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon');
expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good night'); // This will pass, but is a logic bug
expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour');
});
Comment on lines +14 to +19
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix test to verify correct behavior instead of bugs.

The test currently validates the buggy behavior of getGreetingTime. Tests should verify the intended correct behavior, not the bugs.

Apply this diff to test the correct behavior:

 test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => {
   expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning');
   expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon');
-  expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good night'); // This will pass, but is a logic bug
+  expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good evening');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(22)).toBe('Good night');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(-1)).toBe('Invalid hour');
   expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour');
 });
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => {
expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon');
expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good night'); // This will pass, but is a logic bug
expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour');
});
test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => {
expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon');
expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good evening');
expect(getGreetingTime(22)).toBe('Good night');
expect(getGreetingTime(-1)).toBe('Invalid hour');
expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour');
});
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.test.tsx around lines 14 to 19, the test for getGreetingTime
incorrectly expects 'Good night' for an invalid hour (20), which is a logic bug.
Update the test to expect the correct greeting for valid hours only and to
return 'Invalid hour' for out-of-range inputs like 20 and 25. Adjust the
assertions to reflect the intended correct behavior of getGreetingTime.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add comprehensive test coverage for boundary cases.

The current test coverage is incomplete. Add tests for boundary values and edge cases to ensure robust validation.

Consider adding these additional test cases:

+test('getGreetingTime handles boundary cases correctly', () => {
+  expect(getGreetingTime(0)).toBe('Good morning');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(11)).toBe('Good morning');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(12)).toBe('Good afternoon');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(17)).toBe('Good afternoon');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(18)).toBe('Good evening');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(21)).toBe('Good evening');
+  expect(getGreetingTime(23)).toBe('Good night');
+});
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => {
expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon');
expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good night'); // This will pass, but is a logic bug
expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour');
});
test('getGreetingTime returns correct greeting', () => {
expect(getGreetingTime(9)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(15)).toBe('Good afternoon');
expect(getGreetingTime(20)).toBe('Good night'); // This will pass, but is a logic bug
expect(getGreetingTime(25)).toBe('Invalid hour');
});
test('getGreetingTime handles boundary cases correctly', () => {
expect(getGreetingTime(0)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(11)).toBe('Good morning');
expect(getGreetingTime(12)).toBe('Good afternoon');
expect(getGreetingTime(17)).toBe('Good afternoon');
expect(getGreetingTime(18)).toBe('Good evening');
expect(getGreetingTime(21)).toBe('Good evening');
expect(getGreetingTime(23)).toBe('Good night');
});
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.test.tsx around lines 14 to 19, the test cases for
getGreetingTime lack coverage for boundary and edge cases. Add tests for
boundary values such as 0, 11, 12, 17, 18, and invalid inputs like negative
numbers or numbers greater than 23 to ensure the function handles all edge cases
correctly and returns expected greetings or error messages.

14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions src/Greeting.tsx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
import React from 'react';

export function Greeting({ name }: { name: string }) {
// Introduce a bug: if name is empty, it should say 'Guest', but this is not handled
return <h2>Hello, {name.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;
}
Comment on lines +3 to +6
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jun 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the empty name handling bug.

The component doesn't handle empty names as mentioned in the comment. When name is empty, it should display "Guest" instead of leaving it blank.

Apply this diff to fix the empty name handling:

 export function Greeting({ name }: { name: string }) {
-  // Introduce a bug: if name is empty, it should say 'Guest', but this is not handled
-  return <h2>Hello, {name.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;
+  const displayName = name.trim() || 'Guest';
+  return <h2>Hello, {displayName.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;
 }
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.tsx around lines 3 to 6, the Greeting component does not handle
the case when the name prop is an empty string. To fix this, update the
component to check if the name is empty or falsy, and if so, use the string
"Guest" instead before converting to uppercase. This ensures the greeting always
displays a valid name.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@coderabbitai explain this code block

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sidhardha I'll explain the code block from my suggested fix:

 export function Greeting({ name }: { name: string }) {
-  // Introduce a bug: if name is empty, it should say 'Guest', but this is not handled
-  return <h2>Hello, {name.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;
+  const displayName = name.trim() || 'Guest';
+  return <h2>Hello, {displayName.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;
 }

What this code does:

  1. const displayName = name.trim() || 'Guest';

    • name.trim() removes any leading/trailing whitespace from the name prop
    • The || (logical OR) operator acts as a fallback mechanism
    • If name.trim() results in an empty string "" (which is falsy in JavaScript), it will use 'Guest' instead
    • If name.trim() has content, it will use that trimmed value
  2. return <h2>Hello, {displayName.toUpperCase()}! Welcome to CodeRabbit review test.</h2>;

    • Uses displayName instead of the raw name prop
    • Converts the display name to uppercase before rendering

Problem this solves:

  • Before: If someone passes an empty string "" or just whitespace " " as the name, the greeting would show "Hello, ! Welcome..." (empty name)
  • After: The greeting will always show "Hello, GUEST! Welcome..." when the name is empty or whitespace-only

Example scenarios:

  • name="John" → displays "Hello, JOHN!"
  • name="" → displays "Hello, GUEST!"
  • name=" " → displays "Hello, GUEST!"

This ensures the component always renders a meaningful greeting even with invalid name inputs.


// Add a new function with a logic bug
export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string {
if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning';
if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon';
if (hour < 24) return 'Good night'; // Bug: should be 'Good evening' for 18-21, 'Good night' for 22-23
return 'Invalid hour';
}
Comment on lines +9 to +14
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the logic bug in time-based greetings.

The function incorrectly returns "Good night" for all hours between 18-23. It should differentiate between "Good evening" (18-21) and "Good night" (22-23). Additionally, it doesn't validate negative hours.

Apply this diff to fix the logic:

 export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string {
+  if (hour < 0 || hour >= 24) return 'Invalid hour';
   if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning';
   if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon';
-  if (hour < 24) return 'Good night'; // Bug: should be 'Good evening' for 18-21, 'Good night' for 22-23
-  return 'Invalid hour';
+  if (hour < 22) return 'Good evening';
+  return 'Good night';
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string {
if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning';
if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon';
if (hour < 24) return 'Good night'; // Bug: should be 'Good evening' for 18-21, 'Good night' for 22-23
return 'Invalid hour';
}
export function getGreetingTime(hour: number): string {
if (hour < 0 || hour >= 24) return 'Invalid hour';
if (hour < 12) return 'Good morning';
if (hour < 18) return 'Good afternoon';
if (hour < 22) return 'Good evening';
return 'Good night';
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Greeting.tsx lines 9 to 14, the getGreetingTime function incorrectly
returns "Good night" for hours 18 to 23 and does not handle negative hours. Fix
this by adding validation to return "Invalid hour" for negative values, return
"Good evening" for hours 18 to 21, and "Good night" for hours 22 to 23. Adjust
the conditional checks accordingly to cover these ranges.