Add Software Architecture

[simskij]

https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture

this list is about systems architecture and includes articles, resources, books, tools etc. on that topic. from what i could tell, no other list curates resources in this layer and as the "art" of working with systems architecture in many senses differ from doing actual programming a separate list for this feels appropriate.

PR Reviews
PR 1501
PR 1497

[sindresorhus]

Thanks for making an Awesome list! 🙌

It looks like you didn't read the guidelines closely enough. I noticed multiple things that are not followed. Try going through the list point for point to ensure you follow it. I spent a lot of time creating the guidelines so I wouldn't have to comment on common mistakes, and rather spend my time improving Awesome.

[sindresorhus]

❯ awesome-lint https://github.com/simskij/awesome-architecture
✖ Linting

  readme.md:35:3
  ✖   1:1   Missing or invalid Table of Contents         awesome/toc
  ✖   1:1   Git repository must be at least 30 days old  awesome/git-repo-age
  ✖   1:25  Invalid badge source                         awesome/badge
  ✖   7:3   Invalid list item link URL                   awesome/list-item
  ✖   8:3   Invalid list item link URL                   awesome/list-item
  ✖   9:3   Invalid list item link URL                   awesome/list-item
  ✖  10:3   Invalid list item link URL                   awesome/list-item
  ✖  11:3   Invalid list item link URL                   awesome/list-item
  ✖  35:3   Link to http://www.gentleware.com/ is dead   no-dead-urls
  ✖  39:2   License image must be SVG                    awesome/license

https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome-lint

[simskij]

Thanks for your feedback, @sindresorhus.
All linting steps now pass.

awesome-architecture $ yarn test                                         master
yarn run v1.12.3
$ awesome-lint
✔ Linting
✨  Done in 3.20s.

[simskij]

Ping @sindresorhus 😄

[sindresorhus]

The list is a little bit light on content. Put more more work into it.

[sindresorhus]

The entry in the Awesome list should:
Include a short description about the project/theme of the list. It should not describe the list itself.

[simskij]

Thanks! Changed.

[SteveRuben]

Thanks !!!

[sindresorhus]

The readme heading should be Awesome Systems Architecture, not awesome-architecture.

[sindresorhus]

I think you should rename the repo too. Just awesome-architecture is too generic and makes people think it's about building architecture.

[simskij]

The list is a little bit light on content. Put more more work into it.

Thanks for the feedback. I'm trying to value high-quality content over quantity. Hopefully, some exposure from the awesome list of awesome lists would help in providing good content in a more rapid pace. Until then, I'm updating it every once in a while when I have something valuable to add. 👍

I think you should rename the repo too. Just awesome-architecture is too generic and makes people think it's about building architecture.

On a social coding platform like github, one would think the opposite would be the case right? Having to specify "awesome-building-architecture" if it's not systems architecture. 😜

[NewAlexandria]

Having to specify "awesome-building-architecture" if it's not systems architecture.

There are many kinds of architecture, even within software engineering. I agree that it would be confusing if left named as such. I side with the idea that this is an important change.

Also, IMO, looking at the list, it leaves out many important things about software architecture. If the merge were my call, I would want to see this awesome-list developed further before merge. Paper We Love is a great resource for important topics in software architecture.

[simskij]

There are many kinds of architecture, even within software engineering. I agree that it would be confusing if left named as such. I side with the idea that this is an important change.

In that case I'd rather opt for the wider definition.

The repo has now been renamed to awesome-software-architecture, and the link in the readme has been updated to reflect that change.

[simskij]

@sindresorhus time for another evaluation? the list has more than twice the content compared to 22 february.

[sindresorhus]

Devops => DevOps

[sindresorhus]

Includes a succinct description of the project/theme at the top of the readme. (Example)

[simskij]

Includes a succinct description of the project/theme at the top of the readme. (Example)

thanks, fixed. 🙌

[sindresorhus]

Tweet: https://twitter.com/awesome__re/status/1126400846856503296