-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 500
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Serve] Scale down old terminal replicas #3550
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for submitting the PR @cblmemo! Left several questions.
all_replica_ids_to_scale_down.extend( | ||
self._select_outdated_nonterminal_replicas_to_scale_down( | ||
replica_infos)) | ||
return all_replica_ids_to_scale_down | ||
|
||
def _select_outdated_nonterminal_replicas_to_scale_down( | ||
self, | ||
replica_infos: List['replica_managers.ReplicaInfo']) -> List[int]: | ||
"""Select outdated nonterminal replicas to scale down.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This refactoring seems not necessary.
all_replica_ids_to_scale_down.extend( | |
self._select_outdated_nonterminal_replicas_to_scale_down( | |
replica_infos)) | |
return all_replica_ids_to_scale_down | |
def _select_outdated_nonterminal_replicas_to_scale_down( | |
self, | |
replica_infos: List['replica_managers.ReplicaInfo']) -> List[int]: | |
"""Select outdated nonterminal replicas to scale down.""" |
if info.version < self.latest_version and info.is_terminal: | ||
all_replica_ids_to_scale_down.append(info.replica_id) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC the original behavior will terminate the failed replicas already. Is this only for removing the FAILED replica entries in the serve status
table? In that case, should we make the sky serve down
command able to remove a FAILED
entry in the table instead?
I feel keeping the FAILED replicas for the previous version might be still useful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it is only for removing those failed records from a user's request. Agree that adding the ability to remove a record in sky serve down
is a better idea. It is implemented in #3179 and I'll take a look soon 🫡
This PR is stale because it has been open 120 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days. |
Previous implementation will keep old terminated (i.e. failed) replicas forever. This PR changes the behaviour to scale down old terminal replicas as well when an update is initiated.
Tested (run the relevant ones):
bash format.sh
pytest tests/test_smoke.py
pytest tests/test_smoke.py::test_fill_in_the_name
conda deactivate; bash -i tests/backward_compatibility_tests.sh