Fix invalid reference to benchmark name

[lhoste-bell]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 69.05% when pulling 6588176 on lhoste-bell:fix-benchmark-name into e5ebe70 on smarr:master.

[smarr]

Thanks for the fix, I added some tests to avoid regressions. You're still using ReBench? :)

[lhoste-bell]

Definitely! I like the integration with codespeed too.
However, I'm still looking for a way to produce paper-ready benchmark figures, any hints there? It seems the csv output was deprecated some time ago.

[smarr]

I am completely relying on a latex/knitr/tikz setup. I can share that if you are interested.

To get a rough idea, check the are-we-fast-yet report. It consumes the full data files directly.

I used to have matplotlib code in ReBench, but it was never flexible enough, so I removed it and switched completely to R. The latex setup is a little bit involved with all the R dependencies, but, I very much like it. Also because with tikz, the plots are looking very nice and the typesetting is completely uniform with the rest of the document.

And for the CSV stuff, did I really remove that? There should still be a report generator. But, I haven't used it in ages, could well be it is broken.

[lhoste-bell]

I'm interested for sure. Feel free to share via mail. The CSV is commented out, see here.

[smarr]

I produced some stripped down setup.
See http://stefan-marr.de/2016/06/writing-papers-with-completely-automated-data-processing/
and https://github.com/smarr/perf-latex-paper

[lhoste-bell]

Awesome, thanks