Research Summary on Arbitrum

[cipherix]

No description provided.

[jamesmcgirk]

@cryptohazard updated with https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uWeHCyHSC0p1MjRawsws7k6CqhB9iAGE0j2sL3AacDU/edit moving to Drafting

[cryptohazard]

first version of the draft done.

[lw-scrf]

@cryptohazard, not sure if i'm supposed to take a look at this for 'peer review' or if this is lucas'/others domain...just let me know. either way, i'm looking forward to reading this research summary.

[jamesmcgirk]

You’re welcome to take this one as a peer review! Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>

…

________________________________ From: LW ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 6:44:13 AM To: smartcontractresearchforum/research_content ***@***.***> Cc: James McGirk ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [smartcontractresearchforum/research_content] Research Summary on Arbitrum (#145) @cryptohazard<https://github.com/cryptohazard>, not sure if i'm supposed to take a look at this for 'peer review' or if this is lucas'/others domain...just let me know. either way, i'm looking forward to reading this research summary. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#145 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALOY2GM3I7WOYZ5GITFPRDLUDMVK3ANCNFSM47OP2BKA>. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

[lw-scrf]

@jamesmcgirk cool. just didn't want to step on any toes, as a new kid. will take a look.

[lw-scrf]

i started doing some proofreading and decided that i should focus on content and leave proofreading for later aka the editorial review step.

@cryptohazard interesting read so far. look forward to reading the rest and possibly entire paper when/if i have time...

[jamesmcgirk]

@flyinglimao would you like to take a look at this one for peer review?

[jamesmcgirk]

@cryptohazard do you think this one is ready for @cipherix yet?

[cryptohazard]

yeah @jamesmcgirk . I got some nice comments from @lw-scrf and changed some parts. Now I guess @cipherix can add his.

[jamesmcgirk]

Glad to hear it, moved to Final Content Review, flagging @cipherix

[jamesmcgirk]

@cryptohazard would this go in the 'scaling' category? Or mech design?

[jamesmcgirk]

@cryptohazard there were a couple of notes left to resolve from @cipherix

[jamesmcgirk]

@cryptohazard editorial review is finished, please answer the GtM questions and resolve the remaining two notes (which are suggestions for paring down the summary)

[encore9870]

This one is has already been published to the forum. Should we move it out of the pipeline?

https://www.smartcontractresearch.org/t/research-summary-arbitrum-fast-scalable-private-smart-contracts/885