Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this in the identifiers.org registry? #4

Closed
ariutta opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Is this in the identifiers.org registry? #4

ariutta opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@ariutta
Copy link

ariutta commented Oct 1, 2015

Hello,

I am trying to use this resource in conjunction with the identifiers.org registry. It doesn't appear to be included there yet, so it would be great to file a ticket to create a new collection to represent it. Here is where you can file the ticket:
http://sourceforge.net/p/identifiers-org/new-collection/new/

I would file it myself, but I want to be sure the collection is described correctly, so it would be more appropriate for someone from the project to file the ticket.

Thanks!

@egonw
Copy link
Collaborator

egonw commented Jan 20, 2016

Hi Anders,

ontologies not commonly get registered in identifiers.org, only databases... then again, I guess ChEBI is registered, but that is a clear outlier ontology, which has a huge number of instances... now, NPO seems to have this too, with a number of specific nanomaterials, but these are still really classes...

I will email Nick Juty...

Egon

@ariutta
Copy link
Author

ariutta commented Jan 21, 2016

Sounds reasonable. Thanks!
On Jan 19, 2016 8:51 PM, "Egon Willighⓐgen 0000-0001-7542-0286" <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Hi Anders,

ontologies not commonly get registered in identifiers.org, only
databases... then again, I guess ChEBI is registered, but that is a clear
outlier ontology, which has a huge number of instances... now, NPO seems to
have this too, with a number of specific nanomaterials, but these are still
really classes...

I will email Nick Juty...

Egon


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4 (comment).

@cmungall
Copy link

As you seem to be compatible with OBO ontologies, reusing these as appropriate, consider registering on obofoundry.org via https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/new

@egonw
Copy link
Collaborator

egonw commented Jan 12, 2024

consider registering on obofoundry.org

@cmungall, I cannot register it, because the "new ontology" template puts restrictions on the license, and expects things that do not exist yet. The license not being CC0/CC-BY may be a blocker.

@egonw
Copy link
Collaborator

egonw commented Jan 12, 2024

I will close this issue, because the original thing will likely not happen, ontology improvement is to be picked up (OBO registration we will try later), and bioregistry.io has it.

@egonw egonw closed this as completed Jan 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants