Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py #13538

Merged

Conversation

Gfrom2016
Copy link
Contributor

@Gfrom2016 Gfrom2016 commented Jul 3, 2024

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes #11310
LAG and ECMP hash offset support has merged in 202311 sonic-net/sonic-swss#3138, remove the xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

After sonic-net/sonic-swss#3138, configure hash_offset along with hash_seed attribute is enabled on 202311 onwards on Broadcom T1 platfrom.

How did you do it?

Remove the xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py

How did you verify/test it?

Run ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_values.py on 7260 T1 DUT and passed.
https://dev.azure.com/mssonic/internal/_build/results?buildId=586225&view=results

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Signed-off-by: zitingguo-ms <zitingguo@microsoft.com>
@ZhaohuiS
Copy link
Contributor

ZhaohuiS commented Jul 3, 2024

@Gfrom2016 is the code change included in sonic-buildimage 202405 branch?
please hold on this PR until the new 202311 image is released.

@Gfrom2016
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Gfrom2016 is the code change included in sonic-buildimage 202405 branch? please hold on this PR until the new 202311 image is released.

I have added 'Request for 202405 image' label, will merge this after the image fix is merged. Thanks for the reminder.

@Gfrom2016 Gfrom2016 marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2024 06:27
@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2024 08:18
@wsycqyz
Copy link
Contributor

wsycqyz commented Jul 4, 2024

PR test re-triggeered.

Copy link
Contributor

@ZhaohuiS ZhaohuiS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Gfrom2016
Copy link
Contributor Author

@StormLiangMS Could you help merge this?

@wangxin wangxin merged commit e30501d into sonic-net:master Jul 9, 2024
17 checks passed
mssonicbld pushed a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
What is the motivation for this PR?
After sonic-net/sonic-swss#3138, configure hash_offset along with hash_seed attribute is enabled on 202311 onwards on Broadcom T1 platfrom.

How did you do it?
Remove the xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py

How did you verify/test it?
Run ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_values.py on 7260 T1 DUT and passed.
https://dev.azure.com/mssonic/internal/_build/results?buildId=586225&view=results

Signed-off-by: zitingguo-ms <zitingguo@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry-pick PR to 202311: #13600

mssonicbld pushed a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
What is the motivation for this PR?
After sonic-net/sonic-swss#3138, configure hash_offset along with hash_seed attribute is enabled on 202311 onwards on Broadcom T1 platfrom.

How did you do it?
Remove the xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py

How did you verify/test it?
Run ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_values.py on 7260 T1 DUT and passed.
https://dev.azure.com/mssonic/internal/_build/results?buildId=586225&view=results

Signed-off-by: zitingguo-ms <zitingguo@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry-pick PR to 202405: #13601

@ZhaohuiS
Copy link
Contributor

@Gfrom2016 if the swss fix is merged in master, we have to remove skip for master and internal.

@Gfrom2016
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Gfrom2016 if the swss fix is merged in master, we have to remove skip for master and internal.

@ZhaohuiS sure, I will raise another PR to un-skip the case

mssonicbld pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
What is the motivation for this PR?
After sonic-net/sonic-swss#3138, configure hash_offset along with hash_seed attribute is enabled on 202311 onwards on Broadcom T1 platfrom.

How did you do it?
Remove the xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py

How did you verify/test it?
Run ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_values.py on 7260 T1 DUT and passed.
https://dev.azure.com/mssonic/internal/_build/results?buildId=586225&view=results

Signed-off-by: zitingguo-ms <zitingguo@microsoft.com>
mssonicbld pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
What is the motivation for this PR?
After sonic-net/sonic-swss#3138, configure hash_offset along with hash_seed attribute is enabled on 202311 onwards on Broadcom T1 platfrom.

How did you do it?
Remove the xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py

How did you verify/test it?
Run ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_values.py on 7260 T1 DUT and passed.
https://dev.azure.com/mssonic/internal/_build/results?buildId=586225&view=results

Signed-off-by: zitingguo-ms <zitingguo@microsoft.com>
arista-hpandya pushed a commit to arista-hpandya/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
What is the motivation for this PR?
After sonic-net/sonic-swss#3138, configure hash_offset along with hash_seed attribute is enabled on 202311 onwards on Broadcom T1 platfrom.

How did you do it?
Remove the xfail marker of ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_value.py

How did you verify/test it?
Run ecmp/test_ecmp_sai_values.py on 7260 T1 DUT and passed.
https://dev.azure.com/mssonic/internal/_build/results?buildId=586225&view=results

Signed-off-by: zitingguo-ms <zitingguo@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test_ecmp_sai_value failed on 202311 image
5 participants