Skip to content

Conversation

majolo
Copy link
Contributor

@majolo majolo commented Sep 19, 2019

/uncc

@improbable-prow-robot improbable-prow-robot added jira/no-ticket Indicates a PR has no corresponding JIRA ticket do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 300-599 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 19, 2019
@improbable-prow-robot improbable-prow-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 600+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 300-599 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 19, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@Helcaraxan Helcaraxan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will unblock when we are ready to consider this for release.

@majolo majolo changed the title WIP Not for merge - Beta deployment APIs Beta deployment APIs Sep 25, 2019
@improbable-prow-robot improbable-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 25, 2019
@majolo
Copy link
Contributor Author

majolo commented Sep 25, 2019

Hey @Helcaraxan I've fixed the example code up now so it's ready for review and release once approved.

{
PlayerIdentityToken = playerIdentityTokenResponse.PlayerIdentityToken,
DeploymentId = _deployment.Id,
DeploymentId = suitableDeployment.Id.ToString(),
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤕

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you mean? Unfortunately this request still takes the deployment id as a string - not much I can do.

@Helcaraxan
Copy link
Contributor

It appears that this PR is failing when trying to perform the new calls. Are we sure that the new Beta service is implemented by spatiald?

@majolo
Copy link
Contributor Author

majolo commented Sep 26, 2019

@Helcaraxan yes that's true, it's not yet implemented but will be soon. Workflows have a ticket to update this example and I've reverted it back to using the Alpha until then.

@Helcaraxan
Copy link
Contributor

@majolo I am not happy merging (and releasing) this if the local flow is not supported.

This brings me to another point which is: why are we not removing the Alpha from the SDK?

@Helcaraxan Helcaraxan merged commit a4dad8e into master Sep 26, 2019
@Helcaraxan Helcaraxan deleted the generate-beta-apis branch September 26, 2019 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/no-ticket Indicates a PR has no corresponding JIRA ticket size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 600+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants