-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
qi ssfp_ellipse #25
Comments
Hello, Apologies, this was missing from the docs. I've added it in this [commit] (d39b539#diff-b1a9cca87b23c0eac392fdc91661ed4d). Is this clear? Let me know if it works! |
Thanks, the program ran without problem but I think I probably messed something up as images are either noisy (g) or just noise (the rest). I think I need to check if I correctly converted the phase steps to frequency offsets (as this is what is entered at the scanner). One other question, in your experience are 3 pairs sufficient or is it worthwhile to acquire more images?
Thanks.
From: Tobias Wood <notifications@github.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 4:07 PM
To: spinicist/QUIT <QUIT@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Jones, Richard <richard.jones@choa.org>; Author <author@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [spinicist/QUIT] qi ssfp_ellipse (#25)
External sender. Use caution with links and attachments.
Hello,
Apologies, this was missing from the docs. I've added it<https://quit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Docs/Relaxometry.html#qi-ssfp-ellipse> in this [commit] (d39b539#diff-b1a9cca87b23c0eac392fdc91661ed4d<d39b539#diff-b1a9cca87b23c0eac392fdc91661ed4d>).
Is this clear? Let me know if it works!
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#25 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO5Y45XGOKTLTRLL3JXWDX3RJJP5TANCNFSM4LS7RNMA>.
|
Hello, 3 pairs spaced equally (so 60 degrees between each increment) were sufficient for my paper. However, the original PLANET authors used 5 pairs (10 data points). If you can put the images on a service I can download them from, I'm happy to take a quick look. |
Hi there,
Richard Jones (coeurdelion2@protonmail.com) invited you to view the file " Transfer.zip " on Dropbox.
Richard said:
"PLANET data (see e-mail for details). Thanks, Richard"
View file[1]
Enjoy!
The Dropbox team
Richard and others will be able to see when you view this file. Other files shared with you through Dropbox may also show this info. Learn more[2] in our help center.
[1]: https://www.dropbox.com/l/scl/AACPSxSi-oyQbJTyDKHpU-GgDuohWzL-F4w
[2]: https://www.dropbox.com/l/AABGZsBl0CxsxtpWaUS0PnwMpcst-NatJGM
|
Thanks for the offer, which I’m happy to take advantage of. I’ll put the data on dropbox shortly, the rest of the relevant information is :-
Data acquired on a 3T Philips Ingenia scanner, TR=5msec. Phase offsets implemented using frequency offsets in the standard user interface, phase offsets of -2•••• -•••• •• •••• 2•••• •, which corresponded to frequency offsets of -66.67, -33.33, 0, 33.33, 66.67 and 100.0 Hz respectively.
Magnitude and phase data saved on the scanner, converted from DICOM to NIFIT using dcm2nii, the resulting magnitude and phase NIFTI files were converted to complex NIFTI using your qicomplex routine, these were then concatenated into a single file.
I’ve also included the magnitude and phase data for one offset and the complex data for this offset created using both quit & fslcomplex and the result of subtracting the two complex data sets (which wasn’t zero).
The magnitude images were summed and bet was used to create a brain mask from the summed data set.
Let me know if I’ve forgotten anything.
Thanks in advance,
Richard
From: Tobias Wood <notifications@github.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 9:20 AM
To: spinicist/QUIT <QUIT@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Jones, Richard <richard.jones@choa.org>; Author <author@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [spinicist/QUIT] qi ssfp_ellipse (#25)
External sender. Use caution with links and attachments.
Hello,
3 pairs spaced equally (so 60 degrees between each increment) were sufficient for my paper<https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mrm.28149>. However, the original PLANET authors used 5 pairs (10 data points).
If you can put the images on a service I can download them from, I'm happy to take a quick look.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#25 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO5Y45XARBH3TK6C37OQAULRJX2QVANCNFSM4LS7RNMA>.
|
Hi there,
In case you missed it, Richard Jones (coeurdelion2@protonmail.com) shared "Transfer.zip" with you on Dropbox.
Richard said:
"PLANET data (see e-mail for details). Thanks, Richard"
View on Dropbox[1]
Thanks!
- The Dropbox Team
…____________________________________________________
Dropbox, Inc.
PO Box 77767, San Francisco, CA 94107
View Privacy Policy[2] | Unsubscribe[3]
[1]: https://www.dropbox.com/l/scl/AADnsEjjVY77C8WcsJXji_TAtCLQQKXBnsk
[2]: https://www.dropbox.com/l/AADH7T1bfPaQ5ZaS25Dx32BI_Vf7nBywc3I/privacy#privacy
[3]: https://www.dropbox.com/l/AAAAr_ca0DWrhvh8PsOuNPxSfkGQRSZPCNQ
|
Posting here for posterity as the problem was solved via e-mail: The input phase images (from a Philips scanner) had a scaling factor of 1000 (i.e. range was roughly -3141 to +3141). They needed to be divided by 1000 to get a range of -pi to +pi before conversion to complex and processing. |
Would it be possible to post an example JSON file for qi ssfp_ellipse?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: