Skip to content

Fix deprecations in javadocs #31713

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

dreis2211
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

this PR fixes a couple of deprecations in javadocs following some changes in Spring Framework.

Cheers,
Christoph

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jul 13, 2022
@philwebb philwebb added type: documentation A documentation update and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jul 18, 2022
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 3.0.x milestone Jul 18, 2022
@snicoll snicoll modified the milestones: 3.0.x, 3.0.0-M4 Jul 18, 2022
@snicoll snicoll self-assigned this Jul 18, 2022
snicoll pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2022
@snicoll snicoll closed this in 590bfd8 Jul 18, 2022
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Jul 18, 2022

Thanks again Christoph.

wilkinsona added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
This reverts commit 590bfd8, reversing
changes made to 993e1bf.
@dreis2211
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wilkinsona Why has the commit been reverted?

@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

wilkinsona commented Jul 19, 2022

Oops, sorry. I didn't mean to push that. Thanks for noticing my mistake. I was experimenting to see if I could learn if it was possible to get doclint to fail the build when javadoc references a deprecated method. I've reinstated the changes.

wilkinsona added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants