Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document support for merging custom TELs with default TELs in the reference manual [SPR-12083] #16699

1 task done
spring-projects-issues opened this issue Aug 14, 2014 · 1 comment
in: test type: documentation


Copy link

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Aug 14, 2014

Sam Brannen opened SPR-12083 and commented

Status Quo

#13496 introduced a mechanism for registering default TELs if a custom TEL is registered via @TestExecutionListeners, but this feature has not yet been documented in the reference manual.


  1. Document the new MergeMode feature in @TestExecutionListeners in the reference manual, including various examples demonstrating the REPLACE_DEFAULTS and MERGE_WITH_DEFAULTS modes.

Affects: 4.1 RC2

Issue Links:

  • #13496 Introduce mechanism for registering default TELs if a custom TEL is registered via @TestExecutionListeners ("depends on")
  • #16698 Document automatic discovery of default TestExecutionListeners in the reference manual

Referenced from: commits 4c2aa6a

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Aug 31, 2014

Sam Brannen commented

Addressed in GitHub commit 4c2aa6a:

Document support for merging TELs with defaults

This commit restructures the content of the "TestExecutionListener
registration and ordering" section of the Testing chapter in the
reference manual into cross-referenced subsections with more
appropriate titles.

In addition, this commit introduces a new "Merging
TestExecutionListeners" subsection which documents the new MergeMode
feature in @TestExecutionListeners, including an example demonstrating

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
in: test type: documentation
None yet

No branches or pull requests

2 participants