Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

condition vs. conditional typo in @Cacheable reference documenation [SPR-12273] #16878

Closed
spring-projects-issues opened this issue Sep 29, 2014 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
in: core status: backported type: documentation
Milestone

Comments

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Sep 29, 2014

Anders D. Johnson opened SPR-12273 and commented

The condition parameter for @Cacheable is referred to as conditional in the reference documentation. It seems this was a typo.

http://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/cache.html#cache-annotations-cacheable-condition


Affects: 4.1 GA

Referenced from: commits 6009c09, 1df8133, bc0e59f

Backported to: 4.0.8

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Sep 29, 2014

Anders D. Johnson commented

I have signed and agree to the terms of the SpringSource Individual Contributor License Agreement (ICLA 090414).

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Sep 29, 2014

Anders D. Johnson commented

Linking to my GitHub pull request #654.

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Sep 30, 2014

Stéphane Nicoll commented

Thanks! I've also fixed the typo in 4.0.x

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added status: backported type: documentation in: core labels Jan 11, 2019
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added this to the 4.1.1 milestone Jan 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: core status: backported type: documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants